PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

PS5-1. Effects of Dietary Standardized Ileal Digestible Lysine on Growth Performance and Economical Outcomes of Immunologically-castrated Male Pigs Weighing 81 to 111 kg

View Full Paper
BBB. M. BohrerBHBlaine HansenJLJose Landero

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how different levels of standardized ileal digestible lysine affect growth performance and economic outcomes in immunologically castrated male pigs.
  • 1,008 immunologically castrated male pigs assigned to 48 pens with 6 dietary treatments of SID lysine levels (0.60%-0.91%)
  • Data analyzed using pen as the experimental unit, assessing linear and quadratic effects of dietary lysine
  • Results measured included average daily gain, gain:feed ratio, and estimated income over feed costs.
  • Average daily gain increased linearly from 1.22 kg/d to 1.29 kg/d as SID lysine rose from 0.60% to 0.91% (P < 0.01)
  • Gain:feed improved linearly from 0.372 to 0.404 between 0.60% and 0.85% SID lysine (P < 0.01)
  • Estimated income over feed costs showed a weak quadratic response, not significantly affected by SID lysine levels (P = 0.16).

Abstract

Abstract Objectives of this study were to determine the effects of standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine on growth performance and economical outcomes of immunologically-castrated male pigs weighing 81 to 111 kg. The experiment consisted of 1, 008 pigs (PIC 800 sire line × PIC Camborough F1 sows) randomly assigned to one of 48 pens (21 pigs/pen). Six dietary treatments were designed in a titration manner with equidistant treatments. Treatments for SID lysine levels (as-fed) were 0. 60%, 0. 66%, 0. 72%, 0. 79%, 0. 85%, or 0. 91%. Net energy was formulated to equivalent levels of 2. 41 Mcal/kg. Minimum ratios of 30% Met: Lys, 60% Met+Cys: Lys, 66% Thr: Lys, 21% Trp: Lys, 70% Val: Lys, 56% Ile: Lys, and 102% Leu: Lys on a SID basis were used for all diets. Diets were formulated to meet or exceed other nutrient requirements established by NRC (2012). Diet costs were estimated using commercial costs in Canada during 2024 (i. e. , where and when the experiment took place) and were CAD424 for the 0. 60% SID lysine diet, CAD429 for the 0. 66% SID lysine diet, CAD433 for the 0. 72% SID lysine diet, CAD446 for the 0. 79% SID lysine diet, CAD459 for the 0. 85% SID lysine diet, and CAD473 for the 0. 91% SID lysine diet. Pigs were administered the second dose of the GnRF analogue on d 17 of the 23 d of the experiment. Data were analyzed with pen as the experimental unit. Dietary SID lysine level served as the fixed effect and pen replicate served as a random effect. Two single-degree of freedom orthogonal contrasts were used to test the linear or quadratic effects of increasing SID-lysine level. Linear effects (P 0. 01) were observed for average daily gain (ADG) and gain: feed (G: F) while a quadratic effect (P = 0. 04) was observed for estimated income over feed costs. Average daily feed intake was affected (P = 0. 03) by treatment but not in a consistent manner across the equidistant treatments. Average daily gain increased linearly from 1. 22 kg/d to 1. 29 kg/d as SID lysine level increased from 0. 60% to 0. 91%. Gain: feed increased linearly from 0. 372 to 0. 404 as SID lysine level increased from 0. 60% to 0. 85% and was not different between SID lysine levels of 0. 85% and 0. 91%. Estimated income over feed costs showed a weak quadratic response with the greatest numerical levels occurring at the SID lysine level of 0. 66% but were unaffected by treatment (P = 0. 16). In conclusion, the greatest levels of performance were achieved at SID lysine levels of 0. 85% for immunologically castrated male pigs weighing 81 to 111 kg, while estimated income over feed costs were unaffected by the different levels of SID lysine tested in this experiment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bohrer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b828764d2https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag107.363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper