PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Workplace Health & Safety0 citations

The Effect of Workplace Health Promotion Programs on Quality of Life in Women Employees: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
AKAyşenur KarakuşGAGökçen Akyürek

Key Points

  • This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs on the health and quality of life of female employees.
  • Conducted a systematic search of six databases for randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2025.
  • Included 20 randomized controlled trials with a total of 3,962 female employees, with 11 studies contributing to the meta-analysis.
  • Various interventions included physical activity, mindfulness, self-management education, and relaxation techniques.
  • Workplace health promotion programs showed a significant positive effect on overall quality of life (SMD = 0.71).
  • Moderate improvements observed in general quality of life and small-to-moderate effects on physical health outcomes.
  • Positive yet non-significant effects on psychological and mental health outcomes, marked by substantial heterogeneity.

Abstract

Background: Workplace health promotion programs are gaining prominence due to their potential to improve the physical and mental health of female employees. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs on general health and quality of life outcomes in working women. Methods: A systematic search of six databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2025. A total of 20 randomized controlled trials involving 3,962 female employees were included, with 11 studies contributing to the meta-analysis. Interventions varied in type and duration, including physical activity, mindfulness, self-management education, and relaxation techniques. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model (Hedges’ g), and subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention types. Results: Workplace health promotion programs demonstrated a significant positive effect on overall quality of life (SMD = 0.71). Subgroup analyses revealed a moderate and significant improvement in general quality of life, a small-to-moderate but consistent effect on physical health outcomes, and positive yet non-significant effects on psychological and mental health outcomes, which were characterized by substantial heterogeneity. Conclusion: Workplace health promotion programs are effective in enhancing health and quality of life among female employees across diverse work settings. Future research should explore long-term outcomes and adapt interventions for specific needs of subgroups of women. Application to Practice: Workplace health promotion programs can be integrated into occupational health practice to improve health and quality of life among female employees.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karakuş et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b828764dehttps://doi.org/10.1177/21650799261440356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper