PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery1 citationsOpen Access

Second contralateral hip fractures reduce survival, mobility and daily activity : a matched pair analysis

ABAlisa BlattnerFSFlorian SabathTRTimon Röttinger

Key Points

  • Investigate the incidence and long-term effects of second contralateral hip fractures on survival and mobility.
  • Retrospective cohort study at a Level I trauma center.
  • Matched 1:1 patients with a second contralateral hip fracture to those with a single fracture based on age, sex, fracture type, and comorbidities.
  • Assessments included demographic data, functional status, mobility scores, and mortality at multiple time points.
  • 148 out of 1,933 patients (7.6%) had a second contralateral hip fracture, with a mean time to second fracture of 2.2 years.
  • Patients with a second fracture had a shorter time to death (1.06 years) compared to those with a single fracture (1.95 years, p < 0.001).
  • Lower Barthel Index scores (66.7 vs. 77, p=0.019) and reduced mobility scores (5.39 vs. 6.84, p=0.06) were noted among patients with second fractures.

Abstract

Abstract Background Hip fractures in older adults are associated with substantial morbidity, functional decline, and mortality. Patients who experience a first fragility fracture are at high risk of subsequent fractures, with repeated events further exacerbating functional impairment and survival outcomes. Second contralateral hip fractures, while clinically important, remain under-characterized in terms of timing, long-term functional impact, and mortality. Objectives To investigate the incidence, timing, survival, mobility, and daily activity outcomes of second contralateral hip fractures using a matched pair analysis, and to situate these findings within the broader context of repeated fragility fractures. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single Level I trauma center, including all patients treated operatively for hip fractures (AO 31A1–A3, 31B) between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients with a second contralateral hip fracture were matched 1:1 with patients with a single fracture based on age, sex, fracture type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Demographic data, functional status (Barthel Index, Parker Mobility Score), walking aid use, living situation, and mortality were assessed at admission, discharge, and follow-up (minimum 3 years, maximum 7 years). Statistical analysis included paired tests and survival analysis. Results Of 1,933 patients, 148 (7.6%) sustained a second contralateral hip fracture. Mean time to second fracture was 2.2 years, with 40% occurring within the first postoperative year. Time to death after the second fracture was significantly shorter (1.06 vs. 1.95 years, p < 0.001). Whilst one year mortality rate was significantly lower for the cohort of patients with a single hip fracture (18% vs. 33%, p < 0.03), the significance disappeared the longer the follow up time (2- year mortality: 37.9% vs. 48%; p < 0.098; 3- year mortality: 51.6% vs. 52.2%, p < 0.474). Patients with second fractures demonstrated significantly lower Barthel Index (66.7 vs. 77, p=0.019) and Parker Mobility Score (5.39 vs. 6.84, p=0.06) at follow-up, indicating reduced independence and mobility. Discharge to rehabilitation after the first fracture was associated with higher risk of subsequent fracture (58.1% vs. 49.3%, p=0.035). Conclusion Second contralateral hip fractures are underrecognized events that significantly reduce long-term mobility, independence, and survival time post-fracture. Most occur within the first two years after the initial fracture, highlighting a critical window for targeted monitoring, fall prevention, and optimized osteoporosis management. Early identification of high-risk patients, especially those discharged to rehabilitation, is essential to mitigate functional decline and mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blattner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b828764e6https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06331-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper