PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026JBI Evidence Synthesis0 citations

Prevalence and incidence of pressure injury in adult patients receiving non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

View Full Paper
FMFrancesca MorettoTETeresa EspositoEREduardo Rocca

Key Points

  • To assess the prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries related to non-invasive ventilation in adults with acute respiratory failure.
  • Systematic review following JBI and PERSyst methodology.
  • Study eligibility includes observational and experimental studies on adults with acute respiratory failure treated with NIV.
  • Data extraction by two independent reviewers with quality assessed using JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool.
  • Wide range of reported incidence and prevalence of pressure injuries noted in the literature.
  • Evidence gaps identified in interventions to reduce pressure sores among adult NIV patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the prevalence and incidence of pressure injury associated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in adult patients treated for acute respiratory failure (ARF). INTRODUCTION: Facial pressure sores are a common complication of NIV, impairing skin integrity, patient comfort, and therapy efficacy. However, the ranges of incidence and prevalence reported in the literature are very wide. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review will include analytical observational and experimental studies reporting prevalence and/or incidence of pressure sores in adults treated with NIV for hypoxemic or hypercapnic ARF using oronasal, full-face, or hybrid masks. Any study or study arm testing interventions to reduce pressure sores will be excluded. Studies on pediatric patients and adult patients treated with other interfaces (ie, helmets) will also be excluded. METHODS: This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI and PERSyst methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, national health-agency surveillance systems, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, gray literature, and clinical trial registers to identify unpublished studies. No language limitations will be applied provided an English abstract is available. Two reviewers will independently select studies, and data will be extracted using a customized form. Narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, pooled prevalence and incidence proportion will be calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Methodological quality will be assessed using JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool for Prevalence and Incidence Studies. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024604191.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moretto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf71b9154b0b82876608https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper