PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Sleep Quality and Sleep Health Before and After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
JMJordi Colomina MoralesATAdriano D. S. TargaMHMario Henríquez-Beltrán

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the trajectory of sleep health and quality surrounding hip or knee arthroplasty and the impact of sex and surgical site.
  • Multicenter, prospective cohort study involving 316 patients scheduled for hip or knee arthroplasty.
  • Sleep assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and RU-SATED scale at preoperative and postoperative intervals.
  • Linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts applied for statistical analysis.
  • 40% of patients reported poor sleep quality preoperatively, reducing to 28% by six months postoperatively.
  • Mean PSQI scores dropped from 5.30 to 4.19, with a Cohen's d effect size of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.68; p < 0.001).
  • RU-SATED scores increased from 9.72 to 10.45 (Cohen's d = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.60; p < 0.001), indicating improved sleep health.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Sleep quality is a critical determinant of recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), yet multidimensional trajectories of sleep health remain poorly defined. This study aimed to describe the trajectory of sleep health and sleep quality before and after hip or knee arthroplasty, and to examine the influence of sex and surgical site. Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study was conducted including 316 patients scheduled for primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Sleep was assessed two months before surgery and at one and six months postoperatively, using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the RU-SATED scale. Statistical analyses used linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for participants. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were derived from the residual variance of the mixed models. Results: At baseline, 40% of patients had poor sleep quality. Estimated marginal mean PSQI scores were 5.30 (95% CI: 4.87 to 5.73) preoperatively, 5.71 (5.27 to 6.15) at one month, and 4.19 (3.73 to 4.65) at six months, representing a reduction of 1.11 points (95% CI: 0.69 to 1.54; Cohen’s d = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.68; p 5) fell from 40% to 28%, a 12 percentage-point absolute reduction reflecting individual-level transitions across the validated clinical threshold. Exploratory component analyses showed improvements in subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and sleep disturbance. RU-SATED scores increased from 9.72 (95% CI: 9.46 to 9.98) to 10.45 (10.19 to 10.72) at six months, an improvement of 0.73 points (95% CI: 0.47 to 1.00; Cohen’s d = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.60; p 0.30), with the absolute sex difference narrowing by six months. In hip arthroplasty, no significant sex differences or time-by-sex interactions were observed after adjusting for the age imbalance between sexes. Conclusions: Arthroplasty was associated with significant improvements in multidimensional sleep health by six months, though the first postoperative month represents a period of stagnation or slight decline. Women undergoing knee arthroplasty consistently reported worse sleep than men, although the recovery trajectory was parallel between sexes. These findings highlight the potential value of integrating sleep assessment into perioperative care, particularly for women scheduled for knee arthroplasty, though whether targeted sleep interventions improve clinical outcomes remains to be established through prospective intervention studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morales et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf94b9154b0b828768b2https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103585
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper