PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Physics of Fluids0 citations

Numerical study on the overall cooling effectiveness of the rotating impingement effusion cooling structure under low Reynolds number conditions

View Full Paper
FHFeng HanHPHaotian PuJCJ. Chen

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze how low Reynolds numbers and rotation affect heat transfer in impingement effusion cooling structures for UAVs.
  • Numerical simulations conducted to assess the cooling effectiveness of impingement effusion structures under varying rotation conditions and Reynolds numbers.
  • Evaluated the interaction of internal and external flow along with heat transfer characteristics at Reynolds numbers as low as 2 × 10^4.
  • Compared cooling effectiveness at different rotation directions and analyzed the impact of Coriolis and centrifugal forces.
  • At low Reynolds numbers, the cooling effectiveness decreases from 25.63% to 13.43% as the Reynolds number drops from 5 × 10^5 to 2 × 10^4.
  • The interaction between stable counter-rotating vortex pairs enhances film cooling but becomes asymmetric at low Reynolds numbers, reducing overall effectiveness.
  • Reverse rotation improves film coverage compared to forward rotation, leading to enhanced cooling effectiveness.

Abstract

The operating Reynolds numbers (Re) of high-altitude unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) reduces to around 2 × 104. However, existing low Re experiments differ significantly from the extremely low Re environment of UAVs. The additional forces affect internal impingement flow and heat transfer of impingement effusion cooling structure (IECS) under rotational conditions. Conclusions on whether rotation enhances or weakens heat transfer remain inconsistent. However, the current lack of comprehensive research on the coupling effect of low Re and rotation has not been given sufficient attention. This paper investigates the influence of low Re, rotation, rotation direction on the internal and external flow, and heat transfer characteristics of IECS. Results show that under stationary conditions, compared to high Re, the counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) at film hole outlet dissipates faster at low Re, increasing mixing between jet and mainstream. At low Re, the stable CRVP inside film hole interacts with the external CRVP, further lifting the film. Under rotational conditions, Coriolis and centrifugal forces deflect jet radially outward, improving film coverage between holes. The spanwise-averaged film cooling effectiveness (η) obtained under forward rotation decreases from 25.63% to 13.43% when Re drops from 5 × 105 to 2 × 104. At low Re, the shear vortices at film hole outlet and the downstream CRVP become asymmetric. The CRVP detachment from the surface is reduced than the stationary state, and the mutual disturbance of CRVP increases dissipation and reduces η. Changing rotation direction alters Coriolis force, and reverse rotation increases film wake deflection and enhances η compared to forward rotation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfafb9154b0b828769c6https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0324596
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper