PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

PS3-5. Effects of Different Additives Replacing Zinc Oxide on Performance, Fecal Score, and Incidence of Diarrhea in Weaned Piglets

View Full Paper
LFLucimauro FonsecaGCGabriel CedrolaGBGabriel R. Braga

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effects of different feed additives as replacements for zinc oxide in weaned piglets.
  • 275 mixed-sex piglets weaned at 21 days were allocated to a completely randomized design with 5 dietary treatments, each replicated 11 times.
  • Piglets were fed diets containing varying levels of zinc proteinate, mannan-rich fraction, and a proprietary supplement over three phases of 42 days.
  • Performance parameters included final body weight, average daily gain, average daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio, analyzed using ANOVA.
  • Treatment T5 showed higher final body weight, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake across various phases (P<0.05).
  • Treatment T1 demonstrated better fecal consistency and lower incidence of diarrhea during specific phases compared to other treatments (P<0.05).
  • Overall, the combination of additives in T5 presents a viable alternative to pharmacological zinc oxide for improving piglet performance and reducing diarrhea risk.

Abstract

Abstract Zinc oxide (ZnO) at pharmacological doses (1000 to 3500 ppm) controls diarrhea and improves the performance of weaned piglets. However, due to the environmental impact caused by zinc excretion (Zn), this practice has been restricted. Thus, this experiment evaluated the performance, fecal consistency (FC), and incidence of diarrhea (ID) in weaned piglets fed with low levels of Zn as zinc proteinate (ZnProt-Bioplex® Zn), mannan-rich fraction (MRF-Actigen®), and proprietary blend of sodium butyrate, prebiotic components, and minerals (Viligen™ (VIL)), as substitutes for pharmacological ZnO, all provided by Alltech Inc., São Pedro do Ivaí, PR, Brazil. A total of 275 mixed-sex piglets (Landrace × Large White, PIC 337 × DanBred 90), weaned at 21 days of age, were allocated in a CRD with 5 treatments, 11 replicates of 5 animals. The treatments were: T1 – Basal diet (BD) + pharmacological ZnO (3000 ppm and 2000 ppm in phases 1 and 2, respectively) + Zn sulfate (100ppm Zn) in all phases (ZnOF); T2 – BD + ZnProt (100ppm Zn) (ZnProt); T3 – BD + ZnProt (100 ppm Zn) + 800 g/ton MRF (ZnProt+MRF800); T4 – BD + ZnProt (100ppm Zn) + 800 g/ton MRF + 600 g/ton VIL (ZnProt+MRF800+VIL600); and T5 – BD + ZnProt (100ppm Zn) + 800 g/ton MRF + 1200 g/ton VIL (ZnProt+MRF800+VIL1200). Diets were fed in three phases (0–11d; 11–21; 21–42 days post weaning), with ad libitum access to feed and water. The variables evaluated were final body weight (FBW), average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR). During the first 7 days of each phase, individual pig FC was evaluated using the scale: 1 = solid; 2 = semi-solid; 3 = semi-liquid; and 4 = liquid. Diarrhea was defined as scores 3 or 4 for two consecutive days. Data were subjected to ANOVA and means compared using Tukey’s and Dunnett’s tests at a 5% level of significance. Piglets receiving T5 showed higher FBW, ADG, and ADFI during days 0–11, 21–42, and 1–42 (P 0.05), and lower FCR in the initial period compared to T3. Additionally, T5 showed improved performance compared to T1 in FBW, ADG, and ADFI across different phases according to Dunnett’s test. T1 promoted better FC during days 2-8 and 12-18, and lower DI between days 2-8 (P 0.05). During days 12-18, T1 presented the lowest DI; however, T5 presented intermediate DI (Tukey), but superior to T1 by Dunnett's test (P 0.05). Between days 22 and 28, no significant differences were observed. In conclusion, the combination of ZnProt, MRF, and double-dose VIL (ZnProt+MRF800+VIL1200) is a promising alternative to pharmacological ZnO, providing performance benefits and potential mitigation of diarrhea, and should be further evaluated in combination with other strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fonseca et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfafb9154b0b82876b71https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag107.331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1217. Influence of Alternative Additives to Zinc Oxide on the Bacterial Community Composition and Intestinal Morphology of Weaned Piglets2026
  2. 2Effects of Tetrabasic Zinc Chloride on the Diarrhea Rate, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Indices and Microflora of Weaned Piglets2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Effects of activated zinc oxide on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and intestinal epithelial function in weaned pigs2026
  4. 469 Effect evaluation of two sources of zinc at EU-authorized level on growth performance and gut health of piglets with a low or normal birth weight2024
  5. 5Different sources and dosages of zinc oxide and copper influence growth performance and intestinal health of post-weaning piglets2025 · 1 citations