PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

Surface Electromyography for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring: A Review of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques

View Full Paper
SBSara BruschiMEMarco EspositoSRSara Raggiunto

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize current machine learning and deep learning techniques utilizing surface electromyography for monitoring Parkinson’s disease.
  • Reviewed literature on ML and DL methods applied to sEMG for PD monitoring
  • Examined data acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and model evaluation protocols
  • Identified gaps in dataset size and standardization issues affecting clinical applicability.
  • Highlighted advancements in using ML and DL for diagnosing PD and assessing symptoms
  • Noted challenges such as limited dataset sizes and poor model generalization
  • Outlined a representative processing pipeline for real-world clinical implementation.

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions worldwide, characterized by motor symptoms such as tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia that significantly impair daily life. The current diagnosis and monitoring rely primarily on clinical observations and rating scales (e.g., the MDS-UPDRS), which are subjective and limited in detecting subtle motor alterations, leading to inter- and intra-rater variability. In recent years, wearable sensors such as surface electromyography (sEMG) and inertial measurement units (IMUs) have emerged as non-invasive tools for quantifying neuromuscular activity and motor performance in PD. When combined with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, these signals enable the development of models for disease detection, patient classification, and symptom severity assessment. This review provides a structured overview of recent ML and DL approaches applied to surface electromyography for PD monitoring, addressing a gap in the current literature. It analyzes data acquisition strategies, preprocessing techniques, feature extraction methods, model architectures, and evaluation protocols across tasks such as diagnosis, tremor analysis, freezing of gait detection, and gait assessment. Despite promising results, key challenges remain, including limited dataset size, lack of standardization, and poor generalization. Finally, this work highlights emerging trends and identifies a representative processing pipeline to support real-world clinical translation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruschi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed021b9154b0b82877291https://doi.org/10.3390/s26102927
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multimodal Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Survey2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Parkinson’s Disease Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review2026
  3. 3Co-evolution of machine learning and digital technologies to improve monitoring of Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms2022 · 116 citations
  4. 4Parkinson’s disease Diagnosis and prognosis: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Emphasis on Model Optimization2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Early Detection of Parkinson's Disease Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review2026