PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026ACS Omega0 citationsOpen Access

A Cost Reduction Strategy for Aluminum–Polymer Batteries: The Role of Impurities within AlCl 3

View Full Paper
MRMohammad Mostafizar RahmanAMAmir MohammadSBShuvrodev Biswas

Key Points

  • This work aims to evaluate the impact of AlCl3 impurities on the performance and cost of aluminum-ion batteries with polyamide-based solid polymer electrolytes.
  • Synthesized polyamide-based solid polymer electrolytes using six AlCl3 precursors with varying purities (98%-99.999%) and costs (0.028 Euro/g–6.198 Euro/g)
  • Conducted electrochemical analysis focusing on ionic conductivity, specific capacities, and energy densities
  • Performed microscopic and compositional analyses on the aluminum anode surface
  • No systematic influence of AlCl3 purity on ionic conductivity (0.19–0.21 mS cm–1) and electrochemical stability window (2.70–2.83 V) was observed
  • Electrolytes with low-purity AlCl3 (0.028 Euro/g) achieved a 94% reduction in electrolyte cost compared to high-purity counterparts (6.198 Euro/g)
  • Specific capacities ranged from 28.7–43.5 mAh g–1, showing no clear correlation with impurity levels (≤2%)

Abstract

The electrolyte plays a crucial role in defining the electrochemical performance of aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs), in which AlCl3 serves as the primary ion source. This work systematically evaluates the influence of AlCl3-sourced impurities on polyamide-based solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), with an emphasis on both electrochemical behavior and cost efficiency. SPEs are synthesized using a polyamide matrix and an AlCl3:Et3NHCl ionic liquid containing excess AlCl3. Six AlCl3 precursors with varying purities (98%–99.999%) and costs (0.028 Euro/g–6.198 Euro/g) are employed. Electrochemical analysis reveals that the AlCl3 purity exerts no systematic influence on key performance indicators. Reaction kinetics, aluminum stripping/plating behavior, ionic conductivity (0.19–0.21 mS cm–1), electrochemical stability window (2.70–2.83 V), and Coulombic efficiency (98.0–99.5%) remain nearly identical across all samples. Likewise, specific capacities (28.7–43.5 mAh g–1) and energy densities (3.3–4.5 Wh kg–1) exhibit no clear correlation with declared impurity levels (≤2%). Instead, variations arise primarily from electrolyte formulation and cell fabrication conditions. Complementary microscopic and compositional analyses reveal no significant impurity-induced morphological or compositional differences on the Al anode surface, supporting the electrochemical findings. Cost analysis indicates that low-purity AlCl3 (0.028 Euro/g) delivers comparable performance to high-purity salts (6.198 Euro/g), resulting in a 94% reduction in electrolyte cost and a 56% decrease in total cell cost. These findings highlight the economic viability of lower-purity AlCl3 for scalable AIB production.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed03cb9154b0b8287737ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c13009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Composite cathode material for improved aluminum–polymer batteries2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2On the evaluation of the factors influencing the rate capability of a LiCoO2|Li battery2011 · 24 citations
  3. 3The analysis of electrode impedances complicated by the presence of a constant phase element1984 · 3,673 citations
  4. 4Investigation of Filiform Corrosion on Coated Aluminum Alloys by FTIR Microspectroscopy and Scanning Kelvin Probe2002 · 77 citations
  5. 5Infrared spectra of solid aluminium chloride and bromide1995 · 8 citations