PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Food Measurement & Characterization0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of adsorbent and lyophilization on the recovery of functional compounds from olive pomace by supercritical CO2 extraction

HGHavva Ates Gulmez

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effects of lyophilization and adsorbent on the recovery of compounds from olive pomace using supercritical CO2 extraction.
  • Compared lyophilized olive pomace and perlite-added olive pomace for extraction efficiency and quality.
  • Assessed total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity.
  • Applied response surface methodology to analyze extraction parameters.
  • Maximum TPC recovery reached 2.49% for lyophilized olive pomace and 2.68% for perlite-added olive pomace.
  • Pressure significantly influenced extraction efficiency, while temperature had no significant effect.
  • Perlite-added olive pomace showed slightly lower recovery, but its cost-effectiveness supports industrial use.

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the recovery of valuable compounds from three-phase olive pomace (OP) using supercritical CO 2 extraction (SC-CO 2 ) focusing on the effects of lyophilization and adsorbent addition. Lyophilized olive pomace (LOP) and perlite-added olive pomace (POP) were compared in terms of extraction efficiency and extract quality. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity (ABTS •+ ) were enhanced compared to those of raw pomace. The maximum TPC recovery values reached 2.49% and 2.68% for LOP and POP, respectively. Response surface methodology analysis demonstrated a significant agreement between experimental data and the proposed models for TPC and TPC recovery. Pressure was identified as a pivotal parameter in extraction, whereas temperature had no significant effect. While TPC was described by a linear model for OP, a two-factor interaction (2FI) provided a better fit for LOP. In contrast, the models failed to adequately describe antioxidant activity. Although POP exhibited slightly lower recovery than LOP, its lower cost highlights its potential for industrial applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Havva Ates Gulmez (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0abb9154b0b82877b85https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-026-04450-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper