PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice0 citations

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure and Decision Support Tool Option for Early Intervention Service Quality: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial

View Full Paper
VKVera C. KaelinIllinois CollegeSRSabrin RizkUniversity of Illinois ChicagoYCYi‐Fan ChenUniversity of Illinois Chicago

Key Points

  • This trial aims to establish the preliminary effectiveness of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure in early intervention service quality.
  • Pilot pragmatic trial with 76 caregivers enrolled and 57 completing measures (29 intervention, 28 control).
  • Intervention involved using the Young Children’s Participation in Environment Measure (YC-PEM) and shared decision support tool.
  • Evaluated service quality indicators including caregiver perceptions of family-centeredness and engagement in service design.
  • No significant baseline differences between groups.
  • Post-intervention, the intervention group had 69.2% participation-focused service plans compared to control at 51.4%.
  • Most intervention group plans (84%) met state-level quality criteria.

Abstract

Introduction: The Young Children’s Participation in Environment Measure (YC-PEM) is an evidence-based and promising electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) option to improve early intervention (EI) service quality, such as when designing the EI service plan. Aim: Establish the preliminary effectiveness of implementing the YC-PEM e-PRO and program-specific shared decision support tool option for EI service quality when designing a service plan. Methods: For this 2-arm pilot pragmatic trial with cluster randomization at the provider level, 76 caregivers enrolled and 57 caregivers (n = 29 intervention group; n = 28 control group) completed pre- and post-intervention measures. Intervention group caregivers completed the YC-PEM e-PRO and program-specific shared decision support tool and were compared to usual care on EI service quality indicators: (1) caregiver perceptions of family-centeredness, (2) caregiver activation for shared decision-making, (3) caregiver engagement in service design and implementation; and (4) service plan quality. Results: No significant group differences at baseline were noted. Pre-post EI service quality revealed no significant differences in the adjusted model ( P > .05). However, intervention group families had higher rates participation-focused service plans (69.2%) versus controls (51.4%), most of which met state-level criteria for quality (84%). Conclusion: For EI service quality indicators, this intervention option demonstrated comparable performance to usual care. This finding suggests the intervention promoted high quality, participation-focused service planning despite no overall differences in EI service quality, warranting further testing of implementation factors and effectiveness in various service contexts. Trial Registration Number: NCT04562038

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaelin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0abb9154b0b82877d05https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351261445239
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper