PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring the evidence of direct threats to cetaceans from maritime vessels: A systematic map

View Full Paper
VFValeria FerrariEHEmily HagueMSMarija Sciberras

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the current understanding of how maritime vessels threaten cetaceans and to identify knowledge gaps.
  • Conducted literature searches across three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest) in January 2023.
  • Included 568 documents and extracted 661 records of empirical evidence for analysis.
  • Focused on specific cetacean species and vessel types, emphasizing gaps in data from diverse geographical regions.
  • Majority of records originated from North American waters (n = 274), focusing on bottlenose dolphins (n = 133) and humpback whales (n = 89).
  • Limited evidence available for other cetacean species, including only 21 records for porpoises and 22 for beaked whales.
  • 41.4% of records could not clearly classify the types of vessels involved, indicating significant knowledge gaps.

Abstract

Cetaceans face a multitude of well-recognised anthropogenic threats, many of which can be attributed to the activities of marine vessels that are increasing in number throughout the world’s oceans. This study applies a systematic map methodology to better understand the current state of knowledge on vessel impacts to cetaceans, and to identify data gaps relating to specific geographies, vessel types and species. Literature searches were undertaken in January 2023 using three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest), yielding 28,452 results. After duplicate removal and title, abstract and full-text screening, 568 documents were included in this review, resulting in 661 records of empirical evidence being extracted for further analysis. These records highlighted a focus on certain species (bottlenose dolphins (n = 133) and humpback whales (n = 89)) and vessel types (e.g., eco-tourism boats (n = 145)), and the majority of records were from North American waters (n = 274). There was also limited evidence demonstrating impacts of vessels for entire groups of species including porpoises (n = 21) and beaked whales (n = 22). Given the global distribution of marine mammals and vessels, there were few published records available for African waters and international waters. However, for 41.4% of the records it was not possible to classify the type(s) of vessels represented. Therefore, greater clarity and recognition of the heterogeneity of vessels and their associated impacts would both help improve our understanding of potential knowledge gaps and, importantly, help refine our ability to holistically evaluate and assess the risk(s) maritime traffic poses to cetaceans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferrari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed10fb9154b0b8287844fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348502
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena (L.))2009 · 197 citations
  2. 2Repeated Vessel Interactions and Climate- or Fishery-Driven Changes in Prey Density Limit Energy Acquisition by Foraging Blue Whales2020 · 19 citations
  3. 3Fishers and whales in Iceland2022 · 12 citations
  4. 4Marine piracy prediction and prevention: Policy implications2019 · 38 citations
  5. 5The International Development of Open Access Publishing: A Comparative Empirical Analysis Over Seven World Regions and Nine Academic Disciplines2021 · 25 citations