PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Delivering mRNA Vaccines: Emerging Strategies and Clinical Potential of Nanocarrier Systems For Cancer Treatment

View Full Paper
ADAngelos DodopoulosNSNikoleta SyrianouPSPanagiotis Stamatopoulos

Key Points

  • This review aims to compare various nanocarrier strategies for delivering mRNA vaccines in cancer treatment.
  • Comprehensive overview of four nanocarrier systems: protamine-based complexes, lipid nanoparticles, lipoplexes, and dendritic cell vectors.
  • Critical analysis of clinical trial data in malignancies including melanoma, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer.
  • Evaluation of the advantages and limitations of each delivery system in terms of stability, biodistribution, and immune response.
  • Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) demonstrated the highest encapsulation efficiency among platforms.
  • Dendritic cell vectors offered precision but faced challenges with high manufacturing costs.
  • Protamine-based complexes showed immunostimulatory properties but had lower transfection efficiency.

Abstract

mRNA vaccines represent an innovative immunization platform. However, their clinical success is critically dependent on effective delivery systems to protect the fragile mRNA and guide it into target cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview and critical comparison of prominent nanocarrier strategies, specifically regarding their application in cancer immunotherapy. Herein, four key platforms are discussed: protamine-based complexes, a foundational strategy offering intrinsic immunostimulatory properties yet limited by lower transfection efficiency. Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs), the most clinically validated platform offering high encapsulation efficiency. Lipoplexes (LPX), a flexible alternative to LNPs featuring robust, pro-inflammatory activation favorable for personalized neo-antigen delivery. And dendritic cell (DC) vectors, an ex vivo platform offering high precision but constrained by high manufacturing costs. The present review evaluates the distinct mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of each system based on current clinical trial data in malignancies such as melanoma, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Conclusively, the choice of delivery technology is a critical determinant that dictates the vaccine's stability, biodistribution, and the specific immune response elicited for the treatment of malignancies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dodopoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed10fb9154b0b828784dahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108445
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficient encapsulation of antisense oligonucleotides in lipid vesicles using ionizable aminolipids: formation of novel small multilamellar vesicle structures2001 · 454 citations
  2. 2Bidentate ligands in self-assembly: Synthesis, structure and applications2023 · 31 citations
  3. 3Diversity of PEGylation methods of liposomes and their influence on RNA delivery2019 · 152 citations
  4. 4Tetanus toxoid and CCL3 improve dendritic cell vaccines in mice and glioblastoma patients2015 · 533 citations
  5. 5Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer2017 · 2,511 citations