PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026International Law Reports0 citations

Hungary v. European Parliament

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • The case addresses whether the Court of Justice can annul resolutions from the European Parliament under specific EU treaties.
  • Analysis of Article 263 and Article 269 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
  • Interpretation of Article 7 of the Treaty on the European Union
  • Assessment of the voting requirements for resolutions, particularly how 'votes cast' are counted.
  • The Court ruled on its authority to review European Parliament resolutions related to Article 7.
  • Clarification was provided on the requirement of a two-thirds majority for resolutions and the treatment of abstentions in this count.

Abstract

64 Jurisdiction — Court of Justice of the European Union — Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2007 — Article 263 — Article 269 — Treaty on the European Union, 1992 — Article 7 — Whether Court of Justice of the European Union having jurisdiction to annul European Parliament resolution adopted under Article 7 of the Treaty on the European Union — Rule of law — Whether certain resolutions of European Parliament subject to judicial review Treaties — Interpretation — Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2007 — Article 263 — Article 269 — Treaty on the European Union, 1992 — Article 7 — Requirement of two-thirds majority of votes cast — Meaning of “votes cast” — Whether abstentions must count in determining whether a resolution has received two-thirds of the votes cast — The law of the European Union

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed17eb9154b0b82878ce0https://doi.org/10.1017/ilr.2025.10136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper