PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Virchows Archiv0 citationsOpen Access

ER, PR, and HER2 triple positivity and triple negativity are associated with adverse prognostic significance in endometrial serous carcinoma

ZZZhenwei ZhangTKTahreem A. KarimLCLiang Cheng

Key Points

  • To evaluate the prognostic significance of HER2, ER, and PR status in endometrial serous carcinoma and its impact on survival outcomes.
  • Retrospective analysis of 61 endometrial serous carcinoma cases from January 2017 to April 2024.
  • Assessment of overall survival outcomes based on receptor status and pathologic presentations.
  • Statistical analysis comparing survival among triple-positive, triple-negative, and other subgroups.
  • Triple-positive subgroup had a median survival of 394 days compared to 676.5 days for others (p=0.04).
  • Triple-negative subgroup also demonstrated significantly worse overall survival outcomes.
  • Combined receptor status revealed distinct clinical behaviors and prognostic implications in endometrial serous carcinoma.

Abstract

Endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) is an aggressive tumor of the mullerian system. The prognostic significance of the combined status of HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) on ESC's survival and clinicopathologic outcome remains inadequately reported and understood. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed sixty-one ESC cases diagnosed at our institution between January 2017 and April 2024 for overall survival outcomes and pathologic presentation. Most ESC cases were ER-positive (n = 53, 87%) and PR-positive (n = 42, 69%), while HER2 was positive in 43% of cases (n = 26). Subclassification based on the combined status of ER, PR and HER2 revealed significant heterogeneity of overall survival within both HER2-positive and negative groups. Notably, the triple-positive subgroup had the shortest median survival and poorer prognosis than the other subgroups (p = 0.04; median survival: 394 vs. 676.5 days). The triple-negative subgroup demonstrated significantly worse overall survival as well. The unfavorable clinical outcome in these subgroups was associated with a higher frequency of lower uterine segment, cervical, and lymph node involvement. This study demonstrates that combined HER2, ER, and PR status provides valuable prognostic information in ESC, enabling the identification of subgroups with distinct clinical behaviors. Stratification based on combined receptor status may facilitate more personalized treatment approaches and improve clinical outcomes in this aggressive malignancy. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and explore targeted therapeutic strategies for high-risk subgroups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed17eb9154b0b82878cf8https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-026-04553-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper