PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Wind0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring the Use of Passive Compliant Coatings to Address Wind Turbine Noise

View Full Paper
RGRohith GiridharRTRay TaghaviSFSaeed Farokhi

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of passive compliant coatings in reducing wind turbine noise.
  • Applied two distinct coatings to a flat plate under turbulent conditions using computational fluid dynamics and wind tunnel testing.
  • Conducted computational aeroacoustics analysis and fluid-structure interaction to evaluate noise characteristics.
  • Measured sound pressure levels in wind tunnel tests to compare the noise mitigation potential of the coatings.
  • Coating-1 increased overall sound pressure level (OASPL) by 2.89 dB.
  • Coating-2 reduced trailing edge (TE) noise by 2-4 dB/Hz between 600 and 1575 Hz and lowered OASPL by 1.85 dB.
  • Wind tunnel tests with coating-2 showed a 3.23 dB OASPL reduction, indicating its effectiveness for noise mitigation.

Abstract

Wind is a significant contributor to global energy requirement, with technological advancements in this industry enabling its rapid growth over the last few decades. The rise in demand for clean energy provides the driving factor to make wind more efficient and widespread. One such solution involves mitigating the aerodynamic noise of wind turbine rotors to harness untapped energy and improve turbine efficiency. Quieter wind turbines gain community acceptance, promoting their widespread application. This article explores passive compliant coatings applied to a flat plate under fully turbulent conditions through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and wind tunnel testing. It extends prior flat plate investigations by evaluating the noise mitigation potential of passive compliant coatings in the context of wind turbine trailing edge (TE) noise. Two coatings with distinct material properties were investigated through Computational Aeroacoustics Analysis (CAA) and Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI). While coating-1 (Dow Corning Silastic S-2) increased the overall sound pressure level (OASPL) by 2.89 dB, coating-2 (Dow Corning Sylgard 184) reduced TE noise by 2–4 dB/Hz between 600 and 1575 Hz and lowered the OASPL by 1.85 dB. Within the two configurations investigated, the differences in noise mitigation characteristics may be attributed to variations in coating stiffness and geometric compliance. Based on these simulations, wind tunnel tests were conducted to record noise measurements using coating-2 which revealed a 3.23 dB OASPL reduction, suggesting its suitability for wind turbine noise mitigation applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giridhar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed17eb9154b0b82878e1fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/wind6020021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper