PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Marketing Channels of Cotton Ginning Mills in Raichur District of Karnataka

View Full Paper
SSushmithaKNK. R. NethrayiniMGM.S. Ganapathy

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the efficiency of different marketing channels in the cotton supply chain, focusing on ginning mills.
  • Data collected from 15 cotton ginning mill owners in Raichur, Karnataka.
  • Comparison of two main marketing channels: direct from farmers to ginning mills and through intermediaries.
  • Assessment of marketing costs, price spreads, and marketing efficiency using Acharya's approach.
  • Channel I provides a higher net price for farmers (35.45% share of consumer rupee) compared to Channel II (33.65%).
  • Marketing efficiency is greater in Channel I (0.55) than in Channel II (0.51).
  • Study indicates that reducing intermediaries can enhance economic outcomes for cotton producers.

Abstract

Cotton, a crucial agricultural commodity for India, plays an integral role in the nation’s economy, contributing significantly to foreign exchange earnings, industrial production, and export revenue. This paper examines the cotton marketing system, focusing on the ginning process and the efficiency of different marketing channels. The study specifically analyzes two primary channels in the cotton supply chain: Channel I, where cotton moves directly from farmers to ginning mills and then to spinning mills, and Channel II, where intermediaries (APMC traders) facilitate transactions between farmers and ginning mills. Data were collected from 15 cotton ginning mill owners in Raichur, Karnataka, to assess marketing costs, price spreads, and marketing efficiency. The results indicate that Channel I is more advantageous for farmers, offering a higher net price and a greater share of the consumer rupee (35.45%) compared to Channel II (33.65%). The marketing efficiency, measured using Acharya’s approach, is also higher in Channel I (0.55) compared to Channel II (0.51), demonstrating that a streamlined supply chain without intermediaries yields better economic outcomes for producers. The findings highlight the importance of reducing intermediaries to enhance producer returns and improve the overall efficiency of the cotton marketing system. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing marketing practices within the cotton industry to support sustainable agricultural development and improve the livelihoods of farmers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sushmitha et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed17eb9154b0b82878e35https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.400039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper