PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026International Journal of Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Development of a deep-learning model to detect free air on abdominal computed tomography for surgical decision support

View Full Paper
SKSangwook KimSPSin Hye ParkJLJoonghyup Lee

Key Points

  • The study aimed to develop and validate an AI-based model to detect free air in abdominal CT scans, improving surgical decision-making.
  • Developed a segmentation model, Free Air-Net (FA-NET), refined to FA-NET-NT with negative training.
  • Utilized a retrospective dataset from a single institution (n=162) and validated using internal (n=215) and external cohorts (n=237).
  • Evaluated the model's performance using Dice score, image-wise, and patient-wise sensitivity and specificity metrics.
  • Both models achieved high Dice scores (0.87).
  • FA-NET-NT improved specificity (96%) and maintained high sensitivity (85%) in image-wise analysis.
  • Achieved up to 96% sensitivity for ulcer perforation and maintained high specificity for conditions like appendicitis and pancreatitis.

Abstract

Background: Free air (FA) in the abdominal cavity is a critical finding requiring prompt surgical intervention. We developed an AI-based segmentation model, Free Air-Net (FA-NET), to detect FA in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans and further refined it with negative training to create FA-NET-NT, aiming to reduce false positives. Materials and methods: FA-NET-NT was developed using a retrospective dataset from a single institution ( n = 162). To evaluate its generalizability, the model was validated through both a temporal internal cohort ( n = 215) and an independent external cohort from a different hospital ( n = 237), which included various CT manufacturers and protocols. The model evaluation was threefold: (1) the Dice score coefficient, (2) image-wise, and (3) patient-wise sensitivity and specificity using representative CT segments (segments 4 through 8, out of 20 equally divided sections of the total axial series). If the model detected at least two images having FA among the representative images, the patient was regarded as having FA. Results: Both models achieved high Dice scores (0.87). FA-NET-NT improved specificity (96%) while maintaining high sensitivity (85%) in image-wise analysis. In patient-wise analysis, FA-NET-NT achieved 95–96% sensitivity for ulcer perforation and 82–92% specificity for non-FA conditions (cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and appendicitis). Specificity for ileus remained moderate (62%). In the external validation, the model demonstrated a patient-wise sensitivity of 95% for ulcer perforation. High specificity was maintained against differential diagnoses, including appendicitis (88%), pancreatitis (88%), cholecystitis (82%), and ileus (80%). Most false-positive findings were attributable to physiological bowel gas mimicking FA. Conclusion: FA-NET-NT is a robust decision-support tool for detecting FA, with its generalizability confirmed through multi-institutional validation. To provide definitive evidence of its clinical superiority, further prospective multi-center trials are necessary in emergency settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed17eb9154b0b82878e64https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000005385
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper