PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013515 citations

What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?

View Full Paper
GCGabriela CsurkaDLDiane LarlusFPFlorent Perronnin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this work, we consider the evaluation of the semantic segmentation task. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the few existing measures, and propose new ways to evaluate semantic segmentation. First, we argue that a per-image score instead of one computed over the entire dataset brings a lot more insight. Second, we propose to take contours more carefully into account. Based on the conducted experiments, we suggest best practices for the evaluation. Finally, we present a user study we conducted to better understand how the quality of image segmentations is perceived by humans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Csurka et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff7a21e92f4a033c852a98https://doi.org/10.5244/c.27.32
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis2002 · 11,422 citations
  2. 2Towards total scene understanding: Classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework2009 · 496 citations
  3. 3Get Out of my Picture! Internet-based Inpainting2009 · 107 citations
  4. 4Fisher Kernels on Visual Vocabularies for Image Categorization2007 · 1,648 citations
  5. 5Yet Another Survey on Image Segmentation: Region and Boundary Information Integration2002 · 526 citations