PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2023Management Science33 citationsOpen Access

Managing Outpatient Service with Strategic Walk-ins

View Full Paper
NLNan LiuWJWillem van JaarsveldSWShan Wang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Outpatient care providers usually allow patients to access service via scheduling appointments or direct walk-in. Patients choose strategically between these two access channels (and otherwise balking) based on the trade-off of appointment delay and in-clinic waiting. How to manage outpatient care with such dual access channels, taking into account patient strategic choice behavior, is a challenge faced by providers. We study three operational levers to address this management challenge: service capacity allocation between these two channels, appointment delay information revelation via the choice and design of online scheduling systems, and a walk-in triage system that restricts the use of walk-in hours only for acute care. By studying a stylized queueing model, we find that neither a real-time online scheduling system (which offers instant access to appointment delay information at time of booking) nor an asynchronous online system (which does not directly provide delay information) can be universally more efficient. Although real-time systems appear more popular in practice, asynchronous systems sometimes can result in higher operational efficiency. Under the provider’s optimal capacity allocation, which scheduling system is more efficient hinges on two key factors: the patient demand–provider capacity relationship and patient willingness to wait. For the walk-in triage system, we find that it may or may not be beneficial to adopt; the provider’s own cost trade-off between lost demand and overtime work is the key determinant. Our research highlights that there is no one-size-fits-all model for outpatient care management, and the best use of operational levers critically depends on the practice environment. This paper was accepted by Jayashankar Swaminathan, operations management. Funding: S. Wang’s work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 72001220 and 71931008. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4676 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff89a9b124fe5819857ca1https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4676
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Equilibrium Threshold Strategies: The Case of Queues with Priorities1997 · 141 citations
  2. 2Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness2008 · 5,678 citations
  3. 3Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach2008 · 287 citations
  4. 4Multimodularity in the Stochastic Appointment Scheduling Problem with Discrete Arrival Epochs2019 · 60 citations
  5. 5Managing Appointment-Based Services in the Presence of Walk-in Customers2019 · 82 citations