PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 4, 2005Cancer606 citationsOpen Access

Developing a cancer‐specific geriatric assessment

View Full Paper
AHArti HurriaCity Of Hope National Medical CenterSGSupriya GuptaUniversity of MinnesotaMZMarjorie G. ZaudererWestchester Medical Center

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population ages, there is an emerging need to characterize the "functional age" of older patients with cancer to tailor treatment decisions and stratify outcomes based on factors other than chronologic age. The goals of the current study were to develop a brief, but comprehensive, primarily self-administered cancer-specific geriatric assessment measure and to determine its feasibility as measured by 1) the percentage of patients able to complete the measure on their own, 2) the length of time to complete, and 3) patient satisfaction with the measure. METHODS: The geriatric and oncology literature was reviewed to choose validated measures of geriatric assessment across the following domains: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, psychological status, social functioning and support, and nutritional status. Criteria applied to geriatric assessment measurements included reliability, validity, brevity, and ability to self-administer. The measure was administered to patients with breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, or lymphoma who were fluent in English and receiving chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) or the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL). RESULTS: The instrument was completed by 43 patients (mean age, 74 yrs; range, 65-87 yrs). The majority had AJCC Stage IV disease (68%). The mean time to completion of the assessment was 27 minutes (range, 8-45 mins). Most patients were able to complete the self-administered portion of the assessment without assistance (78%) and were satisfied with the questionnaire length (90%). There was no association noted between age (P = 0.56) or educational level (P = 0.99) and the ability to complete the assessment without assistance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, this brief but comprehensive geriatric assessment could be completed by the majority of patients without assistance. Prospective trials of its generalizability, reliability, and validity are justified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hurria et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffa754ef8139f8ff776b12https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21422
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictors of Immediate and 6‐Month Outcomes in Hospitalized Elderly Patients1988 · 335 citations
  2. 2Weight Change in Old Age and its Association with Mortality2001 · 578 citations
  3. 3Relation between cognitive impairment and early death in the elderly.1990 · 79 citations
  4. 4Physical Functioning Measures1992 · 90 citations
  5. 5The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons1991 · 14,546 citations