PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 11, 2006Circulation237 citationsOpen Access

Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Conduits Calcify and Fail From Xenograft Rejection

View Full Paper
RMRizwan A. ManjiLZLin ZhuNNNimrit K. Nijjar

Structured PICO

Does glutaraldehyde-fixed xenograft rejection cause inflammation and calcification in a rat model of bioprosthetic heart valve transplantation?

P
Population
Young rat recipients of ascending aorta/valve transplants (from rats [syngeneic] or guinea pigs [xenogeneic])
I
Intervention
Glutaraldehyde-fixed (G-F) xenogeneic ascending aorta/valve transplantation, with or without steroid treatment
C
Comparator
Fresh syngeneic or G-F syngeneic ascending aorta/valve transplantation
O
Outcome
Valve and media/adventitia inflammation score, percent graft infiltration by T cells/macrophages, rat IgG levels, and calcificationsurrogate

Glutaraldehyde-fixed xenografts undergo cellular and humoral rejection leading to secondary calcification, suggesting an immunological mechanism for bioprosthetic valve failure.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glutaraldehyde fixation (G-F) decreases but likely does not eliminate the antigenicity of bioprosthetic heart valves. Rejection (with secondary dystrophic calcification) may be why G-F xenograft valves fail, especially in young patients, who are more immunocompetent than the elderly. Therefore, we sought to determine whether rejection of G-F xenograft occurs and to correlate this with graft calcification. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ascending aortas/valves (from rats syngeneic or guinea pigs xenogeneic) were transplanted (fresh or after 48 hour of G-F) into the infrarenal aortas of young rat recipients for 20 days. A xenogeneic group was also treated with steroids until graft harvest. The valves and media/adventitia were scored blindly for inflammation (0 to 4). Percent graft infiltration by T cells/macrophages was determined (immunohistochemistry), and rat IgG ELISAs were performed. There was >3 times more valve inflammation, >10 times more valve T-cell/macrophage infiltrate, and >3 times antibody rise in the G-F xenogeneic groups compared with the fresh syngeneic or the G-F syngeneic groups (P2 times more adventitial inflammation and T-cell/macrophage infiltrate in the xenogeneic groups (P<0.05). Steroid treatment decreased inflammation and antibody rise in the xenogeneic groups (P<0.05). Correlation analysis revealed media/adventitia inflammation (P=0.02) and percent macrophage (P=0.01) infiltration to be predictors of calcification. CONCLUSIONS: G-F xenografts have cellular/humoral rejection and calcify secondarily.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Manji et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffc4216be84a7ac88553cahttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.549311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Residual Heteroantigenicity of Glutaraldehyde‐Treated Porcine Cardiac Valves1980 · 18 citations
  2. 21995 Survey on the management of hypertension in Belgium1997 · 1 citations
  3. 3Inhibition of cusp and aortic wall calcification in ethanol- and aluminum-treated bioprosthetic heart valves in sheep: background, mechanisms, and synergism.2003 · 53 citations
  4. 4Onset and progression of calcification in porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves Implanted as orthotopic mitral valve replacements in juvenile sheep1994 · 87 citations
  5. 5Mechanism of efficacy of 2-amino oleic acid for inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde-pretreated porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.1994 · 162 citations