PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2019BJU International86 citationsOpen Access

Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real‐time pathological examination of prostatic tissue

View Full Paper
SPStefano PuliattiLBLaura BertoniGPGiacomo Maria Pirola

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the first application of ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) - a novel optical technology that is capable of providing fast microscopic imaging of unfixed tissue specimens- in the urological field assessing its diagnostic accuracy for non neoplastic and cancerous prostate tissue (prostatic adenocarcinoma) compared to the 'gold standard' histopathological diagnoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 89 specimens from 13 patients with clinically localised prostate cancer were enrolled into the study. All patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with fresh prostatic tissue biopsies taken at the end of each intervention using an 18-G biopsy punch. Specimens were randomly assigned to the three collaborating pathologists for evaluation. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was tested by the means of Cohen's κ. The diagnostic performance was evaluated on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic agreement between FCM and histopathological diagnoses was substantial with a 91% correct diagnosis (κ = 0.75) and an area under the curve of 0.884 (95% confidence interval 0.840-0.920), 83.33% sensitivity, and 93.53% specificity. CONCLUSION: FCM seems to be a promising tool for enhanced specimens' reporting performance, given its simple application and very rapid microscopic image generation (<5 min/specimen). This technique may potentially be used for intraoperative pathological specimens' analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Puliatti et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffeb2b4716aad0cc8584ddhttps://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14754
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma2015 · 3,245 citations
  2. 2Feasibility of digitally stained multimodal confocal mosaics to simulate histopathology2009 · 114 citations
  3. 3Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Detect Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsies2012 · 249 citations
  4. 4Multiphoton microscopy for structure identification in human prostate and periprostatic tissue: implications in prostate cancer surgery2011 · 70 citations
  5. 5Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer2010 · 36 citations