PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026BMC Psychology1 citationsOpen Access

Trust in AI: scale development and validation for online distance learners

AÜAyşin Gaye ÜstünMYMehmet YavuzBKBünyami Kayalı

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop and validate a scale measuring student trust in AI within online distance learning contexts.
  • Sequential multi-stage design including item generation, expert evaluation, and psychometric validation.
  • Exploratory factor analysis conducted with 412 students, confirmatory factor analysis with 307 students, and a validation sample of 118 students.
  • Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis to assess metric invariance across gender.
  • A five-factor structure explaining 63.20% of the total variance was supported by exploratory factor analysis.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit with CFI = .95, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .06.
  • The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .94; ω = .94) and no significant gender differences were observed.

Abstract

Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical factor influencing students' interactions with AI-supported learning environments. However, validated instruments for measuring student trust in AI within educational contexts remain limited. This study developed and validated a multidimensional scale to assess student trust in AI systems in online distance education. Scale development followed a sequential multi-stage design, including item generation based on literature review, expert evaluation for content validity, and psychometric validation through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. A total of 837 distance learning students participated in the study (EFA = 412; CFA = 307; validation sample = 118). Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure explaining 63.20% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis with an independent sample indicated good model fit (Formula: see text/df = 2.17; CFI = .95; TLI = .94; RMSEA = .06). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .94; ω = .94). Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis supported metric invariance across gender, indicating comparable measurement across groups. No significant gender differences were observed, and trust in AI was not significantly associated with grade point average or system engagement frequency. These results suggest that trust represents a distinct perception that may influence how students engage with AI-supported learning environments. The resulting 21-item scale provides a reliable instrument for investigating student trust in AI and offers practical implications for the design and implementation of AI-supported learning in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Üstün et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00205ec8f74e3340f9b405https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04679-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper