PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Journal of Family Theory & Review1 citationsOpen Access

A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving

View Full Paper
ASAlvin Chuen Wei SeahNational University of SingaporeTYTin Mei YeoNational University of SingaporeZHZoe Jane‐Lara HildonNational University of Singapore

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore how caregiving is organized and negotiated across different generations and contexts.
  • Conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
  • Searched seven databases and Google Scholar for studies since 2000.
  • Analyzed 49 eligible studies focusing on familial care exchanged across generations.
  • Caregiving is influenced by proximity and co-residence, affecting care intensity.
  • Distance leads to various arrangements, including mediated contact and formal services.
  • Care flows are multidirectional and influenced by affectual climate and consensual governance.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Families remain central to later‐life support, yet evidence on intergenerational caregiving is fragmented across dyads, generations, and cultural contexts. This scoping review maps how caregiving is organized and negotiated across structural, associational, affectual, functional, consensual, and normative dimensions. Following PRISMA‐ScR and Arksey and O’Malley's framework, seven databases and Google Scholar were searched. Eligible studies reported empirical findings on care exchanged between family members of different generations, sampled at dyadic, triadic, or family levels, and published in English since 2000. Data were charted to Intergenerational Solidarity dimensions and intergenerational ambivalence and synthesized using a framework approach. Forty‐nine studies met criteria, largely qualitative and Western. Proximity and co‐residence structured caregiving intensity, while distance prompted mediated contact, remittances, rotational arrangements, and formal services. Care flows were multidirectional and networked, moderated by affectual climate and consensual governance. Policy should recognize caregiving as networked and multidirectional, while research must broaden samples and adopt longitudinal designs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0020aec8f74e3340f9b83bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70067
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Young Adult Caregivers for Older Family Members: Setting a New Research Agenda2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Family Dynamics over the Life Course2022 · 9 citations
  3. 3Hearing Their Voice: A Systematic Review of Dementia Family Caregivers’ Needs2016 · 311 citations
  4. 4MEASURING INTERGENERATIONAL AMBIVALENCE TOWARD OLDER ADULTS IN THE FAMILY CONTEXT: A SCOPING REVIEW2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Life Problems and Perceptions of Giving Support: Implications for Aging Mothers and Middle-Aged Children2016 · 13 citations