PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Public reactions to hospitals after adverse events involving AI

View Full Paper
JCJ ChoiYKYJ KimPLP Lyu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how public reactions and perceptions of accountability differ for hospitals after AI-involved adverse events compared to those involving human physicians.
  • Participants evaluated scenarios involving adverse events with either human physicians, AI, or collaborative AI-physician interactions.
  • Responses regarding accountability, likelihood of filing complaints, and legal actions were collected and analyzed.
  • Participants attributed more responsibility to hospitals in AI-related adverse events compared to those involving only human physicians.
  • There was an increased likelihood of participants filing complaints and pursuing legal actions after adverse events involved AI.
  • Negative perceptions were reduced when physicians collaborated with AI, suggesting nuances in accountability perceptions.

Abstract

Although AI is increasingly implemented in healthcare, little is known about how the public assigns accountability to hospitals following AI-involved adverse events. We found that, compared to adverse events involving a human physician alone, participants attributed more responsibility to hospitals and reported a higher likelihood of filing a complaint and pursuing legal action when adverse events involved AI. However, when physicians interactively collaborated with AI, negative reactions toward hospitals were attenuated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0020aec8f74e3340f9b8aahttps://doi.org/10.17863/cam.129975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper