PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026SLEEP0 citations

0795 Polysomnographic and Clinical Associations of Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Restless Legs Syndrome (Co-ROSA)

View Full Paper
JSJasmeet SandhuMPMelissa PalominoLDLourdes DelRosso

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the unique clinical features and psychiatric outcomes associated with Co-ROSA compared to OSA and RLS alone.
  • Patients were classified into four groups based on the presence of OSA and RLS.
  • Polysomnography data and comorbidities were analyzed using ANOVA and logistic regression.
  • A total of 153 adults underwent in-laboratory PSG, assessing anxiety and depression among other comorbidities.
  • Patients with Co-ROSA had significantly higher odds for anxiety (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.47–12.26, p=0.023) compared to OSA alone.
  • Co-ROSA patients had higher depression odds (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.04–8.31, p=0.021) than all other groups.
  • Sleep latency was longer and total sleep time shorter in Co-ROSA, but these differences were not statistically significant.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome (RLS), recently termed Co-ROSA, has been increasingly recognized but remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare comorbidities, sleep architecture, and psychiatric outcomes in patients with Co-ROSA with controls, OSA, and RLS alone. The central research question was whether Co-ROSA represents a distinct phenotype with amplified risk for specific comorbidities. Methods We studied adults undergoing in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) at an academic sleep center. Patients were classified into four groups: Group 0 (neither condition), Group 1 (OSA only), Group 2 (Co-ROSA), and Group 3 (RLS only). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and PSG parameters were compared between groups using ANOVA, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. We examined associations with medical and psychiatric comorbidities, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and medication use. Results A total of 153 patients were included. The mean age was 58.0 ± 21.1 years in Group 0, 54.6 ± 19.9 in Group 1, 54.2 ± 16.2 in Group 2, and 64.8 ± 12.7 in Group 3. The proportion of male participants was 55.6% in Group 0, 60.0% in Group 1, 56.5% in Group 2, and 37.5% in Group 3. Patients with Co-ROSA (group 2) had longer sleep latency (23.9 ± 22.2 minutes), shorter total sleep time (330.8 ± 67.5 minutes), and higher WASO (wake after sleep onset: 74.7 ± 53.3 minutes) compared to Groups 0 and 1, although not statistically significant. Group 2 also exhibited the highest rates of anxiety (63.2%) and depression (52.6%) compared to all other groups (p 0.05). Regression analyses confirmed Co-ROSA as an independent predictor of both anxiety (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07–2.67, p=0.023) and depression (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.10–3.09, p=0.021). When compared to OSA alone, patients with Co-ROSA had fourfold higher odds of anxiety (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.47–12.26) and higher odds of depression (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.04–8.31). Odds ratios for other medical comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, and insomnia, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Patients with Co-ROSA represent a high-risk subgroup with disproportionately elevated risk of depression and anxiety independent of demographic and pharmacologic confounders. Polysomnographic, comorbidities, or medication use were not statistically significant. Support (if any) none

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sandhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0020eac8f74e3340f9bb69https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0794
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper