PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Paediatrics in German-Annexed Alsace

ASAisling Shalvey

Key Points

  • This research examines pediatric practices in the context of National Socialism in occupied Alsace.
  • Focused on Strasbourg's Kinderklinik under Dr Kurt Hofmeier from 1941 to 1944.
  • Analyzed pediatric care variations driven by regime engagement and exclusionary policies.
  • Explored the interplay between official Nazi policies and local community responses.
  • Pediatric care was influenced by ideologies prioritizing health for the 'worthy' while excluding others.
  • Local variations in care often contradicted official Nazi policies to maintain community support.
  • The illusion of autonomy was used to placate the local population amid oppressive health measures.

Abstract

Paediatrics during National Socialism focused on the preservation of health for a select idealized version of the future German population. When annexed territories were occupied, their population was subject to such exclusionary idealism too. This paper takes the example of the city of Strasbourg and the Nazified Reichsuniversität Straßburg (1941–1944), particularly the Kinderklinik under Dr Kurt Hofmeier, to illustrate how this process practically worked in the occupied region. This paper also addresses how in the occupied city, pediatric care varied between encouragement to engage with the regime, exclusionary policies for those who were not considered ‘worthy,’ but also placating the local population through an illusion of autonomy. It will also discuss how, because of this regional variation in occupied territories, official policies were often not practically implemented in an effort to placate the community more effectively. Thus, pediatrics in Alsace incorporated regional specificities, while adhering to the overarching ideology of Nazism, in prioritising medical care for the select hierarchy of those considered to be ‘worth’ to the Volk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aisling Shalvey (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002126c8f74e3340f9c0e8https://doi.org/10.26164/leopoldina_10_01413
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper