PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026SLEEP0 citations

0872 Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire in the Screening of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea

View Full Paper
OLOlga LackiIIImran Iftikhar

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire for detecting obstructive sleep apnea in children.
  • Included studies reporting data for 2x2 confusion matrices.
  • Used bivariate random-effects model to calculate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio.
  • Pooled data from 4 studies with sensitivity and specificity measures.
  • Pooled sensitivity of PSQ was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.87) and specificity was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.55).
  • The area-under-the-curve in the summary receiver-operating curve was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.73).
  • Fagan's nomogram predicted OSA probabilities of 50% when positive and 30% when negative.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In this study we aimed to study the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. Methods Studies reporting sufficient information to construct 2x2 confusion matrices were included. The diagnostic threshold AHI from PSG was AHI 1. Bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate mean sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR, -LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), summary receiver-operating curve (SROC), Fagan’s nomogram and LR scattergram. Where reported, a pooled mean estimate of correlation between PSQ, and PSG-determined AHIs were computed. Results DTA meta-analyses included 4 studies. The bivariate weighted mean sensitivity and specificity pooled sensitivity, specificity, +LR, -LR and DOR of PSQ from 4 studies were 0.77 0.62, 0.87, 0.42 0.29, 0.55, 1.3 1.1, 1.6, 0.56 0.36, 0.88, 2.0 1.0, 4.0, respectively. The area-under-the-curve in the SROC was 0.69 0.65, 0.73. +LR and −LR pairings were plotted a quadrant of LR scattergram that indicated the test was neither good for ruling-in nor for ruling-out OSA. With 43% prevalence of OSA in the pooled cohort of studies, Fagan’s nomogram predicted OSA probabilities of 50% when the test is positive and 30% when the test is negative. The pooled Spearman’s correlation coefficients between PSQ and PSG-determined AHIs was 0.18 (0.10; 0.25), p 0.001, based on 8 studies. Conclusion As a screening questionnaire for pediatric sleep apnea, PSQ showed acceptable sensitivity but poor specificity. Further studies are required to assess the role of PSQ in screening for pediatric OSA. Support (if any)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lacki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002162c8f74e3340f9c392https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0871
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 10780 Pediatric OSA Assessment Tool to Predict Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing2024
  2. 20873 Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance of Type 3 Home Sleep Apnea Tests and Peripheral Arterial Tonometry Studies in Diagnosis of Pediatric OSA2026
  3. 3The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for sleep-related breathing disorders: An Umbrella Review2024
  4. 40861 HSAT Diagnostic Performance in Identifying Residual Obstructive Sleep Apnea Compared to Polysomnography in Children Post Adenotonsillectomy2026
  5. 5Assessment of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, and Mallampati Score in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Observational Study2024