PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Journal of Burn Care & Research0 citations

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Fever and Adverse Clinical Events in Hospitalized Pediatric Burn Patients

View Full Paper
LHLior Har‐ShaiSGSapir GershovTLTomer Lagziel

Key Points

  • This study aims to create a predictive model using machine learning to identify hospitalized pediatric burn patients at risk for fever and adverse clinical events.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 595 pediatric burn patients from 2012 to 2022.
  • Used a Random Forest algorithm to predict fever, PICU transfer, and need for surgical intervention.
  • Implemented multiple imputation and bootstrap sampling to address data issues and enhance model robustness.
  • The model achieved an F1-score of 0.81 for fever prediction with an AUC of 0.96.
  • Picu transfer prediction had an F1-score of 0.88 with an AUC of 0.97.
  • Surgical intervention prediction resulted in an F1-score of 0.81 and AUC of 0.95.

Abstract

Abstract Systemic inflammation after pediatric burn injury frequently causes fever, complicating early recognition of infectious complications. Improved risk-stratification may help identify patients at risk for adverse clinical events during hospitalization. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)–based model using a Random Forest (RF) algorithm to predict fever and related adverse outcomes in hospitalized pediatric burn patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 595 pediatric burn patients admitted to a tertiary center between 2012 and 2022. Extracted data included demographics, burn characteristics, clinical interventions, laboratory values, and outcomes. RF models were trained to predict three key endpoints: fever (38.5°C), transfer to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and need for surgical intervention. To address missing data and class imbalance, we employed multiple imputation techniques and generated synthetic data through bootstrap sampling to improve model robustness. The patient cohort had a mean age of 4.27 (range: 0.2-18.1) years and an average total body surface area (TBSA) of 5.49 (range: 0.3-45.0). The RF models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with F1-scores of 0.81±0.037 (fever), 0.88±0.091 (PICU transfer), and 0.81±0.027 (surgery). Area Under the Curve (AUC) values were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.95, respectively. Feature importance analysis identified younger age, lower body weight, female sex, and head and neck burn location as key predictors. These ML-based RF models demonstrate strong potential for early risk-stratification of fever and high-risk trajectories in hospitalized pediatric burn patients, guiding monitoring intensity, diagnostic vigilance, and resource planning. Prospective evaluation is needed to determine whether model-informed workflows improve outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Har‐Shai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00217ac8f74e3340f9c6a2https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag074
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper