PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education0 citations

Can Thai students thrive in CLIL classrooms?

PKPunwalai KewaraNNNattharmma Namfah

Key Points

  • This study investigates how Thai lower secondary students with limited English engage in CLIL lessons focused on logistics.
  • Examined 25 Thai students' engagement in eight CLIL sessions using video recordings and classroom observations.
  • Assessed comprehension, participation, and communication during visually supported and language-intensive tasks.
  • Identified reliance on Thai language and translation tools among students during instructional challenges.
  • Students successfully completed tasks with visual support but struggled with language-heavy activities needing in-depth explanations.
  • Frequent use of Thai and translation tools indicated a gap between content understanding and academic English proficiency.
  • Findings emphasize the necessity for gradual task progression and explicit language support in low-proficiency contexts.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how 25 Thai lower secondary students with limited English proficiency engaged with their first experience of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in a logistics-focused lesson. Using video-recorded lessons and classroom observations, the study explores students’ comprehension, participation, and communication across eight sessions. The findings show that students successfully completed visually supported and procedural tasks but struggled with language-intensive activities requiring explanation, classification, or justification. Students frequently relied on Thai and translation tools to manage these challenges, indicating a clear gap between their understanding of the content and the academic English needed for disciplinary communication. The study highlights the importance of gradual task sequencing, explicit language scaffolding, and purposeful L1 integration to support early-stage CLIL implementation. Implications are offered for designing realistic, language-aware CLIL instruction that aligns with the needs of low-proficiency students in the Thai context.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kewara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0021e6c8f74e3340f9ccc5https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24040.kew
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Translanguaging and Trans-Semiotizing for Critical Integration of Content and Language in Plurilingual Educational Settings2022 · 28 citations
  2. 2CLIL2010 · 1,446 citations
  3. 3Diverse Contexts – Converging Goals2012 · 70 citations
  4. 4Do Academic Content Gains from a CLIL Course Compare to Content Gains in a L1 Course?: A Preliminary Study of a Pharmaceutical Biotech Course2020 · 2 citations
  5. 5“We can do it together!” – But can they? How Norwegian ninth graders co-constructed content and language knowledge through peer interaction in CLIL2019 · 21 citations