PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026SLEEP0 citations

0895 Sleep and Adjustment in Foster Environments for School-Aged Children (SAFE-C): Feasibility and Acceptance of a Trauma-Informed Sleep Intervention

View Full Paper
ILIvan LeonardCBCarter BakerCAC A Alfano

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of the SAFE-C sleep intervention for school-aged children with histories of trauma from foster care.
  • N=68 children aged 6-10 from foster care were randomized to SAFE-C or waitlist control group.
  • Sleep intervention delivered through telehealth over 4 sessions involving both child and parent.
  • Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and post-treatment, including treatment expectancy and satisfaction assessments.
  • 91% of families in SAFE-C completed all treatment sessions.
  • Parents and children reported high treatment expectancy and satisfaction based on post-treatment questionnaires.
  • Treatment expectancy correlated with older child age (r=.27, p=.031) and lower parenting stress (r=-.31, p=.012).

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep and Adjustment in Foster Environments for Toddlers and Preschoolers (SAFE-T), a brief, trauma-informed pediatric sleep intervention has shown efficacy for improving sleep among 2 to 5 year old children in foster care. Recently, SAFE was modified for use with school-age children (SAFE-C) and evaluated in a randomized controlled trial among 6 to 10 year olds previously placed in foster care. Based on the presence of pervasive sleep problems in this population and because, unlike young children, school-aged children participated in treatment sessions, we were interested in examining treatment feasibility, along with parent and child treatment expectancy and satisfaction. Methods N=68 children (M=7.9, SD=1.4) adopted from foster care and their parent were randomized to SAFE-C (n=32) or waitlist control group (n=36). The intervention was delivered via telehealth over 4 session that included both the parent and child. At baseline, parents and children completed demographic and clinical questionnaires as well as the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) after receiving their treatment assignment. At post-treatment, the SAFE-C group completed the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Results A total of 29/32 families (91%) assigned to SAFE-C completed all treatment sessions. Average time to complete 4 weekly sessions was less than one month (M=26.1 days) and most children actively participated in all treatment sessions. Both parents and children assigned to SAFE-C reported high rates of treatment expectancy. Higher treatment expectancy was associated with older child age (r=.27, p=.031) and lower parenting stress (r=–.31, p=.012) but not severity of child sleep problems. Both parents and children were highly satisfied with the treatment based on CSQ scores as well as qualitative feedback at post-treatment. Conclusion Findings suggest SAFE-C is a feasible and acceptable intervention for school-aged children with a history of adversity and/or trauma associated with foster care placement. Because severity of child sleep problems or sleep-related impairment was not associated with either parent or child treatment expectancy, future research should seek to better understand the factors/variables that shape treatment expectations. Support (if any) This research was supported by NIMH grant #R34MH128598 awarded to C. Alfano.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leonard et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0021e6c8f74e3340f9cd9ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0894
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper