PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026The International Journal of Design Education0 citations

From Abstract to Volume

View Full Paper
MSMine Tunçok SarıberberoğluEÖElif Özgen

Key Points

  • This research examines the transition from abstract to volumetric thinking in basic design education.
  • Utilized a studio-based qualitative evaluation framework.
  • Analyzed works from twenty-one students based on five criteria: formal balance, creativity, spatial thinking, process orientation, and material-technique integration.
  • Considered iterative productions including sketches and model-making in addition to final outcomes.
  • Students showed improved sensitivity in formal balance and process-oriented work.
  • Patterns in constructing spatial depth and volumetric continuity varied among students.
  • The study demonstrates effective application of Bauhaus principles in contemporary design teaching.

Abstract

Grounded in Bauhaus-based basic design pedagogy, the transition from abstract two-dimensional composition to three-dimensional volumetric and spatial thinking in a first-year basic design studio is examined through a studio-based qualitative evaluation framework. The research aims to read students’ iterative productions and learning processes multidimensionally through a method developed specifically for this study and applied within studio practice. The two- and three-dimensional works of twenty-one students, produced through abstract artworks selected from modern art history, were evaluated according to five criteria: formal balance, creativity, spatial thinking, process orientation, and material–technique integration. The analysis relies not only on final outcomes but also on the joint consideration of process outputs such as sketches, intermediate trials, relief explorations, and model-making. The findings reveal that students developed a marked sensitivity in formal balance and process-oriented working; however, they displayed more variable and still-developing patterns in constructing spatial depth, establishing volumetric continuity, and making the light–material relationship a constitutive component of design. The results demonstrate that Bauhaus principles of learning through process, experimentation, and material engagement can be meaningfully reinterpreted within contemporary studio conditions. The shift from two-dimensional abstraction to volumetric and spatial thinking constitutes a critical learning threshold in basic design education. Accordingly, the study offers an applicable and replicable qualitative framework to support the evaluation of studio learning in design education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarıberberoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002222c8f74e3340f9d205https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-128x/cgp/a320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A sculpture-based learning experience in foundational design education: A case study of landscape architecture students2026
  2. 2Digital Visual Culture in Interior Architecture Education: Aesthetic Codes and Spatial Narratives in Student Renderings2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Development of ‘Creative Thinking: Case Study of Basic Design Studio2024
  4. 4Embodied Cognition-Based Assessment and Optimization of Architectural Classroom Environmental Quality2026
  5. 5Students’ cross-sectioning in the math-art studio2024 · 1 citations