PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026SLEEP0 citations

0744 A Systematic Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: Highlighting Lived Experience Involvement

View Full Paper
EBElena BildSEShannon EdmedASAaron Schokman

Key Points

  • This review evaluates non-pharmacological interventions for central disorders of hypersomnolence and the involvement of lived experiences in research.
  • Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines;
  • Search conducted on multiple databases including Medline and PsycINFO;
  • Included studies focusing on interventions for confirmed central disorders of hypersomnolence.
  • 12 studies included from an initial 7804, focusing on varied interventions;
  • Psychological interventions showed improvements in mental health, particularly CBT and MBI;
  • Lived experience involvement was limited, with no standardised reporting observed.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction People with central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH), which include Narcolepsy Types 1 n=3), mindfulness-based (MBI; n=1), and meditation-relaxation therapy (MR therapy; n=1) interventions. Extended nocturnal sleep interventions for narcolepsy generally reported improvements in daytime sleepiness. Napping intervention results for narcolepsy were inconsistent. Psychology interventions (CBT, MBI, and MR therapy) found generally positive results on their primary outcomes; CBT and MBI interventions significantly improved some mental health outcomes; CBT for Nightmares significantly improved nightmare severity; and MR therapy significantly improved sleep paralysis. All studies were pilot or feasibility studies with small sample sizes and good acceptability. One psychology intervention and no napping or sleep schedule interventions were tested with people with IH. People with narcolepsy were involved in three studies, but reporting was limited and did not use recommended reporting procedures. No people with IH were involved in the design of any interventions. Conclusion There has been recent progress in developing adjunctive non-pharmacological interventions for people with CDH that show promising effectiveness. However, involvement of people with CDH using standardised reporting, especially with people with IH, is absent and should be incorporated into future research. Support (if any) Sleep Disorders Australia; ARC Life Course Centre; Australian Government.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bild et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002222c8f74e3340f9d247https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0743
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Burden among participants with central disorders of hypersomnolence in six European countries.
  2. 21199 Closing Gaps in the Evaluation and Treatment of Idiopathic Hypersomnia: Results from a Quality Improvement Initiative2026
  3. 31193 Implementing Patient-Centered Practices to Advance Idiopathic Hypersomnia Care: Key Findings from a Quality Improvement Initiative2026
  4. 4A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations on Interventions Targeting Insomnia or Hypersomnia2025 · 1 citations
  5. 51195 Integrating Educational Outcomes and Real-World Claims Data to Improve Idiopathic Hypersomnia Diagnosis and Management2026