PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 28, 2006Atmospheric chemistry and physics2,127 citationsOpen Access

Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols

MAMeinrat O. AndreaeAGAndrás Gelencsér

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract. Although the definition and measurement techniques for atmospheric "black carbon" ("BC") or "elemental carbon'' ("EC") have long been subjects of scientific controversy, the recent discovery of light-absorbing carbon that is not black ("brown carbon, Cbrown") makes it imperative to reassess and redefine the components that make up light-absorbing carbonaceous matter (LAC) in the atmosphere. Evidence for the atmospheric presence of Cbrown comes from (1) spectral aerosol light absorption measurements near specific combustion sources, (2) observations of spectral properties of water extracts of continental aerosol, (3) laboratory studies indicating the formation of light-absorbing organic matter in the atmosphere, and (4) indirectly from the chemical analogy of aerosol species to colored natural humic substances. We show that brown carbon may severely bias measurements of "BC" and "EC" over vast parts of the troposphere, especially those strongly polluted by biomass burning, where the mass concentration of Cbrown is high relative to that of soot carbon. Chemical measurements to determine "EC" are biased by the refractory nature of Cbrown as well as by complex matrix interferences. Optical measurements of "BC" suffer from a number of problems: (1) many of the presently used instruments introduce a substantial bias into the determination of aerosol light absorption, (2) there is no unique conversion factor between light absorption and "EC" or "BC" concentration in ambient aerosols, and (3) the difference in spectral properties between the different types of LAC, as well as the chemical complexity of Cbrown, lead to several conceptual as well as practical complications. We also suggest that due to the sharply increasing absorption of Cbrown towards the UV, single-wavelength light absorption measurements may not be adequate for the assessment of absorption of solar radiation in the troposphere. We discuss the possible consequences of these effects for our understanding of tropospheric processes, including their influence on UV-irradiance, atmospheric photochemistry and radiative transfer in clouds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andreae et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00240fe92f4a033c853ec7https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Inorganic, organic and macromolecular components of fine aerosol in different areas of Europe in relation to their water solubility1999 · 478 citations
  2. 2Raman scattering and the characterisation of atmospheric aerosol particles1977 · 105 citations
  3. 3The Big Smoke: A History of Air Pollution in London since Medieval Times1989 · 210 citations
  4. 4Optical constants of a hydrogenated amorphous carbon film1984 · 309 citations
  5. 5A comparison of diesel engine soot with carbon black1999 · 289 citations