PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2011Thorax183 citationsOpen Access

Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection

SMSarah MenziesNRNajib M. RahmanJWJohn Wrightson

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine if using blood culture bottles for pleural fluid increases pathogen detection compared to standard culture methods.
  • 62 patients with pleural infection were enrolled.
  • Pairs of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles were inoculated with varying volumes (2, 5, or 10 ml) of pleural fluid.
  • Control samples were cultured to assess false positives.
  • Blood culture bottle culture increased pathogen detection by 20.8%, from 37.7% to 58.5% (p<0.001).
  • Standard culture positivity showed no significant change (38.8% to 44.9%, p=0.08).
  • Inoculum volume did not affect bacterial isolation frequency.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is common, and has a >30% major morbidity and mortality-particularly when infection is caused by Gram-negative, Staphylococcus aureus or mixed aerobic pathogens. Standard pleural fluid culture is negative in ∼40% of cases. Culturing pleural fluid in blood culture bottles may increase microbial yield, and is cheap and easy to perform. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inoculating pleural fluid into blood culture bottles increases the culture positivity of pleural infection over standard laboratory culture, and to assess the optimum volume of inoculum to introduce. METHODS: 62 patients with pleural infection were enrolled. Pairs of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles were inoculated at the bedside with 2, 5 or 10 ml of pleural fluid, and two pleural fluid specimens were sent for standard culture. Pleural fluid from nine control patients was cultured to test for 'false-positive' results. RESULTS: The addition of blood culture bottle culture to standard culture increased the proportion of patients with identifiable pathogens by 20.8% (20/53 (37.7%) to 31/53 (58.5%) (difference 20.8%, 95% CI difference 8.9% to 20.8%, p<0.001)). The second standard culture did not similarly improve the culture positivity (19/49 (38.8%) to 22/49 (44.9%) (difference 6.1%, 95% CI difference -2.5% to 6.1%, p=0.08)). The culture inoculum volume did not influence bacterial isolation frequency. The control fluids were culture negative. CONCLUSIONS: Blood culture bottle culture of infected pleural fluid increases microbial yield when used in addition to standard culture. This technique should be part of routine care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Menzies et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00cacb581c6e761e77dc43https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.157842
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improved method of isolating bacteria from joint fluids by the use of blood culture bottles.1986 · 97 citations
  2. 2Blood culture bottles for transportation and recovery of anaerobic bacteria from non‐blood samples2000 · 4 citations
  3. 3Infections due to anaerobic bacteria and the role of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes2001 · 20 citations
  4. 4Comparison of the effect of delayed entry into 2 different blood culture systems (BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D) on culture positivity2006 · 28 citations
  5. 5Use of the BacT/Alert Blood Culture System for Culture of Sterile Body Fluids Other than Blood1998 · 104 citations