PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2012Soft Matter389 citations

Phase behaviour and complex coacervation of aqueous polypeptide solutions

View Full Paper
DPDimitrios PriftisMTMatthew Tirrell

Key Points

  • To investigate the phase behavior, complex coacervation, and composition of oppositely charged polypeptides with matched chain lengths in aqueous solutions.
  • Mixed equal chain lengths of polycations and polyanions, including poly(L-lysine) and poly(L-glutamic acid), across varying mixing ratios, ionic strengths, polymer concentrations, pH levels, and temperatures.
  • Tracked phase boundaries using turbidity measurements and distinguished coacervates from solid precipitates via optical microscopy.
  • Quantified the water content of the coacervate phase under diverse salt concentrations and mixing stoichiometries.
  • Established phase diagrams defining the critical salt concentrations required to transition between the coacervate and single-phase solution regimes across varying polybase fractions and molecular weights.
  • Demonstrated that salt concentration and mixing stoichiometry significantly govern the water content and final composition of the coacervate phase.

Abstract

Mixing of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions may result in the formation of polyelectrolyte complexes (PEC). Phase separation and complex coacervation of polypeptides are investigated in this study. Polypeptides have identical backbones and differ only in their charged side groups, making them attractive model systems for this work. All experiments are conducted using equal chain lengths of polycation and polyanion in order to isolate and highlight effects of the interactions of the charged groups during complexation. Complex coacervation is strongly affected by the polypeptide mixing ratio (stoichiometry), ionic strength (salt concentration), total polymer concentration, pH, and temperature. To examine the effect of these parameters on complex formation we use sample turbidity as an indicator, and optical microscopy to discriminate between coacervate and precipitate. We establish phase diagrams as a function of polybase content and salt concentration using the critical salt concentrations required to reach the coacervate to solution boundary. Additionally, we examine the effect of molecular weight on the complex formation for the P(L-Lysine) (PLys)/P(L-Glutamic acid) (PGlu) system and establish a phase diagram. By determining the water content of the coacervate phase under various conditions we find that the salt content and stoichiometry of the mixed polyelectrolytes have a significant effect on the coacervate composition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Priftis et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00ed2af9e1acab462d76fdhttps://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25604e
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of the backbone chemistry and ionic functional groups of five pairs of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes on complex coacervation2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Self-Assembling Polypeptides in Complex Coacervation2024 · 79 citations
  3. 3Effects of divalent salts on polyelectrolyte coacervation2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Fast Microdialysis Buffer Exchange to Study Poly(glutamate)/Lysozyme Coacervates in Concentrated Conditions2025
  5. 5Distribution of polyelectrolytes and counterions upon polyelectrolyte complexation2024 · 5 citations