PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2023Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback89 citationsOpen Access

Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines

JLJaume F. LalanzaSLSònia LorenteRBRaimon Bullich

Structured PICO

P
Population
143 studies from any scientific field and any type of sample
I
Intervention
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) protocols
O
Outcome
Description of different HRVB protocols and detection of methodological concerns

This systematic review highlights significant methodological heterogeneity and underreporting in HRVB studies, proposing new guidelines and a checklist to improve future research quality.

Abstract

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual's resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) "Optimal RF" (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) "Individual RF" (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) "Preset-pace RF" (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalanza et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a010e36e4618ba4162dcc9chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac Clocks and Preclinical Translation2017 · 44 citations
  2. 2Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing Intersession Scheduling of Biofeedback Results to Individuals with Chronic Pain2015 · 22 citations
  3. 3Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009 · 83,669 citations
  4. 4Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method2009 · 1,015 citations
  5. 5Cardiac dysautonomia in depression – heart rate variability biofeedback as a potential add-on therapy2019 · 52 citations