PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004Clinical Science243 citations

Relationship between longitudinal and radial contractility in subclinical diabetic heart disease

View Full Paper
ZFZhi You FangRLRodel LeanoTMThomas H. Marwick

Structured PICO

Does diabetes mellitus alter radial and longitudinal contractility in patients with normal ejection fraction and no ischemia compared to age-matched controls?

P
Population
53 patients with diabetes mellitus with no LV hypertrophy, normal ejection fraction and no ischaemia as assessed by dobutamine echocardiography, and age-matched controls
I
Intervention
Diabetes mellitus (observational exposure)
C
Comparator
Age-matched controls
O
Outcome
Radial and longitudinal contractility (peak myocardial systolic velocity [Sm], early diastolic velocity [Em], strain, and strain rate) measured by echocardiographysurrogate

In subclinical diabetic heart disease, increased radial contractility appears to compensate for reduced longitudinal contractility in the absence of ischemia or LV hypertrophy.

Abstract

Subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may be identified by reduced longitudinal contraction. We sought to define the effects of subclinical LV dysfunction on radial contractility in 53 patients with diabetes mellitus with no LV hypertrophy, normal ejection fraction and no ischaemia as assessed by dobutamine echocardiography, in comparison with age-matched controls. Radial peak myocardial systolic velocity (Sm) and early diastolic velocity (Em), strain and strain rate were measured in the mid-posterior and mid-anteroseptal walls in parasternal views and each variable was averaged for individual patients (radial contractility). These variables were also measured in the mid-posterior and mid-anteroseptal walls in the apical long-axis view and each variable was averaged for individual patients (longitudinal contractility). Mean radial Sm, strain and strain rate were significantly increased in diabetic patients (2.9 +/- 0.6 cm/s, 28 +/- 5% and 1.8 +/- 0.4 s(-1) respectively) compared with controls (2.4 +/- 0.7 cm/s, 23 +/- 4% and 1.6 +/- 0.3 s(-1) respectively; all P<0.001), but there was no difference in Em (3.3 +/- 1.2 compared with 3.1 +/- 1.1 cm/s, P=not significant). In contrast, longitudinal Sm, Em, strain and strain rate were significantly lower in diabetic patients (3.6 +/- 1.1 cm/s, 4.3 +/- 1.6 cm/s, 21 +/- 4% and 1.6 +/- 0.3 s(-1) respectively) than in controls (4.3 +/- 1.0 cm/s, 5.7 +/- 2.3 cm/s, 26 +/- 4% and 1.9 +/- 0.3 s(-1) respectively; all P< or =0.001). Thus radial contractility appears to compensate for reduced longitudinal contractility in subclinical LV dysfunction occurring in the absence of ischaemia or LV hypertrophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a011ea369ee78cdf851df54https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20030153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study1979 · 3,994 citations
  2. 2Distribution of cardiac nerves in patients with diabetes mellitus2002 · 12 citations
  3. 3Noninvasive Measurement of Three-Dimensional Myocardial Deformation with Tagged Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Graded Local Ischemia1999 · 51 citations
  4. 4Changes in left ventricular filling during follow-up study in survivors and nonsurvivors of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy1996 · 12 citations
  5. 5L-arginine reduces structural remodeling in the diabetic rat myocardium2002 · 10 citations