PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 2, 2014European Heart Journal370 citations

Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation

View Full Paper
RCRiccardo CappatoMEMichael D. EzekowitzAKAllan L. Klein

Structured PICO

Does rivaroxaban reduce the composite of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion compared to vitamin K antagonists?

P
Population
1504 patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion
I
Intervention
Rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily, 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min)
C
Comparator
Dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)
O
Outcome
Composite of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular deathcomposite

Rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKAs for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion, and may allow prompt cardioversion.

Abstract

AIMS: X-VeRT is the first prospective randomized trial of a novel oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assigned 1504 patients to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily, 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in a 2:1 ratio. Investigators selected either an early (target period of 1-5 days after randomization) or delayed (3-8 weeks) cardioversion strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 5 (two strokes) of 978 patients (0.51%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 5 (two strokes) of 492 patients (1.02%) in the VKA group risk ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-1.73. In the rivaroxaban group, four patients experienced primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (0.71%) and one following delayed cardioversion (0.24%). In the VKA group, three patients had primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (1.08%) and two following delayed cardioversion (0.93%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly shorter time to cardioversion compared with VKAs (P < 0.001). Major bleeding occurred in six patients (0.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and four patients (0.8%) in the VKA group (risk ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.21-2.67). CONCLUSION: Oral rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKAs and may allow prompt cardioversion. NAME OF THE TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov; TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01674647.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cappato et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a015aeb2ff633f365785fc5https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu367
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper