PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026Journal of science and medicine in sport2 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence applications in sport-related concussion: an updated scoping review

View Full Paper
MVMarco VecchiatoFPFilippo Dal PonteEZEmanuele Zanardo

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how artificial intelligence can enhance the diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis, and prevention of sport-related concussion.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search across six databases from inception to December 2025.
  • Classified 55 eligible studies into four domains: Detection & Diagnosis, Monitoring & Surveillance, Prognosis & Recovery, and Prevention & Risk Modelling.
  • Evaluated various AI applications leveraging high-dimensional data across the SRC care pathway.
  • Detection & Diagnosis studies primarily utilized EEG, speech, motor, and multimodal clinical data.
  • Monitoring & Surveillance emphasized wearable sensors and video-based impact detection to enhance accuracy in quantifying exposure.
  • Prognosis & Recovery models assessed reinjury risk and recovery trajectories, while Prevention & Risk Modelling relied on biomechanical and finite element-derived data to estimate injury risk.

Abstract

ObjectivesSport-related concussion (SRC) is a complex mild traumatic brain injury for which diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis remain largely reliant on subjective clinical assessment.Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance objectivity by integrating highdimensional, multimodal data across the SRC care pathway.Design: Scoping review. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted across six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central) from inception to December 2025.Eligible studies were classified into four domains: Detection & Diagnosis, Monitoring & Surveillance, Prognosis & Recovery, and Prevention & Risk Modelling.Results Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, with over 80% published since 2020.Detection & Diagnosis was the most represented domain, primarily leveraging EEG, speech, motor, and multimodal clinical data.Monitoring & Surveillance studies focused on wearable sensors, mouthguards, and video-based impact detection to quantify exposure and reduce false positives.Prognosis & Recovery models explored recovery trajectories, persistent symptoms, and reinjury risk, while Prevention & Risk Modelling studies predominantly relied on biomechanical and finite element-derived data to estimate injury risk.Despite promising performance, studies were highly heterogeneous and frequently limited by small or imbalanced samples, inconsistent outcome definitions, limited external validation, and poor model interpretability Conclusion AI-based approaches show growing potential to support SRC management across multiple clinical domains.However, current evidence supports their use primarily as decision-support tools.Future research should prioritise large, multicentre studies, transparent labelling strategies, explainable AI frameworks, and rigorous external validation to enable safe and clinically meaningful implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vecchiato et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0171983a9f334c28271c6ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2026.05.002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimizing Concussion Care Seeking: Using Machine Learning to Predict Delayed Concussion Reporting2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Identification and Connectomic Profiling of Concussion Using Bayesian Machine Learning2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3The Impact of Drop Test Conditions on Brain Strain Location and Severity: A Novel Approach Using a Deep Learning Model2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation2018 · 43,578 citations
  5. 5Exploring Speech Biosignatures for Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurodegeneration: Pilot Machine Learning Study2025 · 7 citations