PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2014Coronary Artery Disease15 citations

Impact of intra-aortic balloon pumping on hypotension and outcomes in acute right ventricular infarction

View Full Paper
MMMichael McNamaraSDSimon DixonJGJames A. Goldstein

Structured PICO

Does intra-aortic balloon pump support improve hemodynamics and outcomes in patients with acute right ventricular infarction complicated by hypotension?

P
Population
32 patients with acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by right ventricular infarction (RVI), in whom hypotension requiring IABP placement developed despite intact left ventricular ejection fraction.
I
Intervention
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support
O
Outcome
Immediate hemodynamic effects (mean arterial pressure) and clinical outcomes (inhospital death, adverse events)surrogate

IABP support provides immediate hemodynamic improvement in patients with acute right ventricular infarction complicated by shock, and the magnitude of blood pressure augmentation may have prognostic value.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the immediate hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support and clinical outcomes in patients with acute right ventricular infarction (RVI) complicated by hypotension. BACKGROUND: IABP improves hypotension in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular shock, but the effects have not been well studied in acute RVI with predominant right ventricular shock. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in 32 patients with acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by RVI, in whom hypotension requiring IABP placement developed despite intact left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS: Pre-IABP hypotension was present in all (100%) patients, and in every case IABP augmentation increased mean arterial pressure (55.9±7.4 to 76.8±14.7 mmHg, P<0.0001). Adverse clinical events included respiratory distress requiring intubation in 46.9%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 25%, episodes of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in 56.3%, and transvenous pacemaker placement in 56.3% of patients. There were six inhospital deaths (18.8%). Pre-IABP hemodynamics were similar in those patients who survived to discharge compared with those who died. However, in those patients who died, there was significantly lower augmentation of peak systolic blood pressure during IABP support compared with survivors (2.7±17 vs. 27±22 mmHg, P<0.015). CONCLUSION: IABP support results in immediate hemodynamic improvement in patients with acute RVI complicated by shock. The majority of these shock patients survived and the magnitude of mean arterial pressure and peak systolic blood pressure augmentation may impart prognostic value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McNamara et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01b0e9fdf359f3d7d8afb5https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000000139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper