PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2009Investigative Radiology297 citations

Correlation of ADC and T2 Measurements With Cell Density in Prostate Cancer at 3.0 Tesla

View Full Paper
PGPeter GibbsGLGary LineyMPMartin D. Pickles

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between MRI derived parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 relaxation time) and tumor cellularity as determined from whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens, for both prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 16-month period, 20 patients (mean age: 61 years, range: 42-70 years) were prospectively recruited. Diffusion and T2 imaging were performed on a 3.0 Tesla scanner to enable subsequent ADC and T2 calculation. After radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens were whole-mounted and regions of interest (ROIs) drawn in areas of prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone. Cell density was then determined using an adaptive histogram thresholding technique. Differences in tissue type were explored using the unpaired t test while the relationship between parameters was assessed using scatter-plots and the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.0001 in all cases) were noted between peripheral zone tissue and prostatic carcinoma in terms of ADC (1.88 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.43 +/- 0.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s), T2 (142 +/- 24 vs. 109 +/- 20 milliseconds), and cell density (9.4% +/- 3.0% vs. 19.8% +/- 5.3%). A significant negative correlation with cell density was noted for both ADC (R = -0.695, P < 0.0001) and T2 (R = -0.505, P = 0.001). Trends for increased cell density, decreased ADC, and decreased T2 with increasing Gleason score were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: ADC and to a lesser extent T2 are good indicators of cell density. Because of the potential link with Gleason score, MRI derived parameters may have a prognostic role with regard to potential metastatic activity and tumor aggressiveness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gibbs et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01e001897643a80dcb16d5https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0b013e3181b4c10e
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas1999 · 1,169 citations
  2. 2Dynamics of prostate cancer cell invasion studied in vitro by NMR microscopy1999 · 12 citations
  3. 3Malignant renal neoplasms: correlation between ADC values and cellularity in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T2008 · 132 citations
  4. 4Comparison of conventional single echo and multi‐echo sequences with a fast spin‐echo sequence for quantitative T2 mapping: Application to the prostate1996 · 76 citations
  5. 5THE PROSTATE: MR IMAGING AND SPECTROSCOPY2000 · 175 citations