PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2014International Journal of Eating Disorders234 citations

Prevalence of DSM‐5 avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric gastroenterology healthcare network

View Full Paper
KEKamryn T. EddyJTJennifer J. ThomasEHElizabeth Hastings

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few published studies have evaluated the clinical utility of new diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), a DSM-5 reformulation of feeding and eating disorder of infancy or early childhood. We examined the prevalence of ARFID and inter-rater reliability of its diagnostic criteria in a pediatric gastrointestinal sample. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 2,231 consecutive new referrals (ages 8-18 years) to 19 Boston-area pediatric gastroenterology clinics for evidence of DSM-5 ARFID. RESULTS: We identified 33 (1.5%) ARFID cases; 22 of whom (67%) were male. Most were characterized by insufficient intake/little interest in feeding (n = 19) or limited diet due to sensory features of the food (n = 7). An additional 54 cases (2.4%) met one or more ARFID criteria but there was insufficient information in the medical record to confer or exclude the diagnosis. Diagnostic agreement between coders was adequate (κ = 0.72). Common challenges were (i) distinguishing between diagnoses of ARFID and anorexia nervosa or anxiety disorders; (ii) determination of whether the severity of the eating/feeding disturbance was sufficient to warrant diagnosis in the presence of another medical or psychiatric disorder; and (iii) assessment of psychosocial impairment related to eating/feeding problems. DISCUSSION: In a pediatric treatment-seeking sample where ARFID features were common, cases meeting full criteria were rare, suggesting that the diagnosis is not over-inclusive even in a population where eating/feeding difficulties are expected.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eddy et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a021b83449274ec075cce39https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22350
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data1977 · 81,043 citations
  2. 2The Intelligent Clinician's Guide to the DSM-52013 · 87 citations
  3. 3From DSM-IV to DSM-52013 · 177 citations
  4. 4Early Childhood Eating Behaviors and Adolescent Eating Disorders1990 · 451 citations
  5. 5Picky eating during childhood: A longitudinal study to age 11years2010 · 420 citations