PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice0 citations

Multidimensional feature-based assessment of microcirculatory hemodynamic dysfunction in patients with Wagner Grade 0 diabetic foot

View Full Paper
YZYanan ZhaoYLYangxi LiZHZiwei Hu

Key Result

A combined model using multidimensional microcirculatory features from the first and fifth metatarsal heads effectively discriminated between diabetic foot and non-diabetic foot patients (AUC 0.906).

Key Points

  • The study aims to characterize microcirculatory hemodynamic dysfunction in diabetic foot patients using multidimensional assessments.
  • Included 286 participants (157 non-DF, 129 DF) to analyze microcirculation from first and fifth metatarsal heads.
  • Collected time-domain, frequency-domain, rhythmicity, and symmetry metrics from MT1 and MT5 for comparative analyses.
  • Utilized logistic regression with LASSO for feature selection and evaluated model performance with ROC-AUC.
  • Mean perfusion at MT1 and MT5 was significantly lower in the DF group (p < 0.001).
  • AUC for the combined model (MT1 + MT5) was 0.906, outperforming single-site models.
  • Reduced left-right correlation coefficients suggested impaired bilateral coordination, indicating microcirculatory dysfunction.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=286)

Structured PICO

Can multidimensional feature-based assessment of plantar microcirculatory hemodynamics accurately discriminate between patients with and without Wagner Grade 0 diabetic foot?

P
Population
286 consecutive participants, including 129 with Wagner Grade 0 diabetic foot (DF) and 157 without DF (non-DF).
I
Intervention
Multidimensional feature-based assessment of microcirculatory hemodynamic dysfunction (time, frequency, rhythmicity, and symmetry domains) at the forefoot first (MT1) and fifth (MT5) metatarsal heads.
C
Comparator
Non-DF participants.
O
Outcome
Cross-sectional discriminative model performance (ROC-AUC) for distinguishing DF from non-DF participants based on microcirculatory features.surrogate

Multidimensional assessment of plantar microcirculatory features provides high discriminative accuracy for identifying diabetic foot-related microcirculatory abnormalities, offering a quantitative tool for risk stratification.

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUC 0.906

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study characterizes the hemodynamic abnormalities of the microcirculation in the feet of patients with diabetic foot (DF) based on multidimensional features, including time-domain and frequency-domain metrics, rhythmicity, and symmetry. It further elucidates the relationship between these abnormalities and plantar pressure hotspots, specifically the forefoot first metatarsal head (MT1) and fifth metatarsal head (MT5), and constructs a cross-sectional discriminative model. METHODS A total of 286 consecutive participants were included in the study (non-DF: 157, DF: 129). Microcirculation signals from MT1 and MT5 were collected, with features extracted across various domains: time (mean, standard deviation, range, kurtosis), frequency domain (relative power endothelial, neurogenic, myogenic, respiratory, and cardiac bands), rhythmicity (number of peaks, peak intervals, and their dispersion), and symmetry (absolute value of the mean difference between left and right, left-right correlation coefficient). Inter-group comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, and effect sizes were calculated with the Hodges-Lehmann median difference (Δ) and Cliff's δ. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's method with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (BH-FDR) correction. Variables selected by LASSO were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), and the optimal classification threshold was determined using the Youden index. RESULTS Mean perfusion at MT1 and MT5 was significantly lower in the DF group (both p < 0.001), representing the largest between-group differences among the assessed features. Variability metrics differed by measurement site. Notably, the relative power in the neurogenic and myogenic bands at MT1 was significantly decreased, suggesting a weakening of low-frequency autonomic regulation. Furthermore, MT1 exhibited fewer peaks, prolonged inter-peak intervals, and increased dispersion, indicating slower and less stable rhythmicity. Left-right correlation coefficients at bothsites were decreased (p < 0.001), whereas the absolute left-right mean differences did not increase, suggesting reduced synchrony rather than increased amplitude asymmetry. Spearman correlation and multifactor models consistently aligned in direction. Regarding the discriminative models, the area under the curve (AUC) for the MT1 model was 0.845, for the MT5 model was 0.822, and for the combined model (MT1 + MT5) was 0.906, which outperformed the single-site models. CONCLUSION Patients with DF demonstrate a composite pattern of microcirculatory dysfunction characterized by insufficient perfusion, attenuated autonomic regulation, altered rhythmicity, and impaired bilateral coordination. Multidimensional plantar microcirculatory features improve cross-sectional discrimination between DF and non-DF participants, providing a quantitative basis for risk stratification and phenotypic characterization of DF-related microcirculatory abnormalities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Wagner Grade 0 diabetic foot (n=286). Multidimensional feature-based assessment of microcirculatory signals vs. Non-diabetic foot participants was evaluated on Cross-sectional discrimination between diabetic foot and non-diabetic foot using a combined MT1 + MT5 model (AUC 0.906). A combined model using multidimensional microcirculatory features from the first and fifth metatarsal heads effectively discriminated between diabetic foot and non-diabetic foot patients (AUC 0.906).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025a649cddff7633412bd7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper