PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Journal of Electrocardiology0 citations

Accidental reactivation of a retained pacemaker leading to competitive ventricular pacing between two pacemakers: A case report

View Full Paper
XWXiaomao WuZLZelin LiLXL L Xu

Key Result

Targeted interventions successfully resolved competitive ventricular pacing caused by the accidental reactivation of a retained pacemaker two years after device replacement.

Key Points

  • This report aims to describe a rare case of competitive ventricular pacing caused by the unexpected reactivation of a retained pacemaker.
  • Detailed analysis of electrocardiography showing two distinct QRS morphologies.
  • Holter monitoring and imaging studies conducted to confirm dual pacemaker effects.
  • Implementation of targeted interventions to resolve the issue.
  • Identification of two distinct QRS morphologies due to dual pacemakers.
  • Successful resolution of competitive ventricular pacing following targeted interventions.

Study Design

Type

Case Report (n=1)

Structured PICO

P
Population
1 patient with a retained pacemaker and a new pacemaker implanted two years prior
I
Intervention
Targeted interventions to address inadvertent reactivation of the retained pacemaker
O
Outcome
Resolution of competitive ventricular pacing

Highlights a rare case of competitive ventricular pacing due to accidental reactivation of a retained pacemaker and its successful resolution.

Abstract

Herein, we report a rare clinical case of competitive ventricular pacing caused by the accidental reactivation of a retained pacemaker two years after device replacement. Initially, two years following the implantation of the new pacemaker, the device demonstrated typical dual-chamber pacing. However, recent follow-up electrocardiography revealed two distinct QRS morphologies. Holter monitoring, imaging studies, and a review of prior procedural records confirmed that this phenomenon was caused by the unexpected reactivation of the retained pacemaker, leading to competitive ventricular pacing. A detailed analysis of the underlying causes of inadvertent reactivation led to the implementation of targeted interventions, which successfully resolved the issue of competitive ventricular pacing induced by dual pacemakers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Competitive ventricular pacing (n=1). Targeted interventions for pacemaker deactivation was evaluated on Resolution of competitive ventricular pacing. Targeted interventions successfully resolved competitive ventricular pacing caused by the accidental reactivation of a retained pacemaker two years after device replacement.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025c82edf6f481385946ebhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 12017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices2017 · 435 citations
  2. 2Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association2015 · 179 citations
  3. 3Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nondependent Pacemaker Patients with Pacemakers and Defibrillators with a Nearly Depleted Battery2017 · 14 citations
  4. 4Long-Term Mortality After Transvenous Lead Extraction2012 · 177 citations
  5. 5Clinical recognition of pacemaker battery depletion and automatic reprogramming2017 · 17 citations