PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2020European Radiology67 citationsOpen Access

Quantification of myocardial strain assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy subjects—influence of segmentation and analysis software

CLCarolin LimEBEdyta BłaszczykLRLeili Riazy

Structured PICO

Does the choice of segmentation procedure and analysis software influence myocardial strain values assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy adults?

P
Population
Healthy adults
I
Intervention
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking using different segmentation procedures (full coverage vs. three short slices) and analysis software
C
Comparator
Comparison between different segmentation approaches and software vendors
O
Outcome
Global and segmental myocardial strain valuessurrogate

Myocardial strain values assessed by CMR feature tracking vary significantly depending on the segmentation procedure and software used, highlighting the need for standardization.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Quantification of myocardial deformation by feature tracking is of growing interest in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. It allows the assessment of regional myocardial function based on cine images. However, image acquisition, post-processing, and interpretation are not standardized. We aimed to assess the influence of segmentation procedure such as slice selection and different types of analysis software on values and quantification of myocardial strain in healthy adults. METHODS: strain were assessed in basal, midventricular, and apical short-axis views and using full coverage. Global and segmental strain values were compared to each other regarding their post-processing approach and analysis software package. RESULTS: strain values were different between a full coverage approach vs. three short slices (- 17.6 ± 1.8% vs. - 19.2 ± 2.3% and 29.1 ± 4.8% vs. 34.6 ± 7.1%). Different analysis software calculated significantly different strain values. Within the same vendor, different field strengths (- 17.0 ± 2.1% at 1.5 T vs. - 17.0 ± 1.7% at 3 T, p = 0.845) did not influence the calculated global longitudinal strain (GLS), and were similar in gender (- 17.4 ± 2.0% in females vs. - 16.6 ± 1.8% in males, p = 0.098). Circumferential and radial strain were different in females and males (circumferential strain - 18.2 ± 1.7% vs. - 17.1 ± 1.8%, p = 0.029 and radial strain 30.7 ± 4.7% vs. 27.8 ± 4.6%, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: depend on the number of slices used for feature tracking analysis. As known from other imaging modalities, GLS seems to be the most stable parameter. During follow-up studies, standardized conditions should be warranted. Trial registration Retrospectively registered KEY POINTS: • Myocardial deformation assessed by feature tracking depends on the segmentation procedure. • Global myocardial strain values differ significantly among vendors. • Standardization in post-processing using CMR feature tracking is essential.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0289f81abe013fb89e1f7chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07539-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper