PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2009Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology388 citations

Attributable Mortality Rate for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia

View Full Paper
ABAbraham BorerLSLisa Saidel‐OdesKRKlaris Riesenberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the attributable (direct) mortality and morbidity caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. DESIGN: A matched retrospective, historical cohort design, using a stepwise procedure to stringently match the best control subjects to the best case subjects. SETTING: A 1,000-bed tertiary-care university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Case subjects were defined as adult patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteremia during the period from October 2005 through October 2008. Control subjects were defined as patients who were very similar to case subjects except that they did not have bacteremia. METHODS: Matching potential control subjects to case subjects was performed at a 1:1 ratio using a computerized record system. The criteria used included same hospitalization period, similar Charlson comorbidity index, same underlying disease, same age within 10 years, and same sex. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. RESULTS: During the study period, 319 patients developed an infection due to carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Of these 319 patients, 39 (12.2%) developed a bloodstream infection, for an overall rate of 0.59 episodes of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteremia per 10,000 patient-days. We excluded 7 patients from our study, leaving a total of 32 case subjects in our cohort. Case subjects were significantly more likely than control subjects (n = 32) to require care in an intensive care unit (12 case subjects 37.5% vs 3 control subjects 9.4%), ventilator support (17 case subjects 53.1% vs 8 control subjects 25%), and use of a central venous catheter (19 case subjects 59.4% vs 9 control subjects 28.1%). For case subjects, the crude mortality rate was 71.9% (ie, 23 of the 32 case subjects died); for control subjects, the crude mortality rate was 21.9% (ie, 7 of the 32 control subjects died) (P < .001. For case subjects, the attributable mortality was 50% (95% confidence interval CI, 15.3%-98.6%). A mortality risk ratio of 3.3 (95% CI, 2.9-28.5) was found for case subjects with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae require more intensive and invasive care. We have shown that the crude and attributable mortality rates associated with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteremia were striking.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borer et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02a43067f6ea5cc8755101https://doi.org/10.1086/605922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combination Therapy with Intravenous Colistin for Management of Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Patients without Cystic Fibrosis2005 · 185 citations
  2. 2The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)1995 · 2,046 citations
  3. 3Appropriate vs. inappropriate antimicrobial therapy2008 · 143 citations
  4. 4Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Critically III Patients1994 · 946 citations
  5. 5Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method1966 · 18,624 citations