PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2018The Laryngoscope55 citations

Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2

View Full Paper
KPKevin A. PengMLMark Brandt LorenzSOSteven R. Otto

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To report a series of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), where each patient underwent both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation for hearing rehabilitation, and to discuss factors influencing respective implant success. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Ten NF2 patients with both cochlear implantations and auditory brainstem implantations were retrospectively reviewed. Speech testing for auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) and cochlear implants (CIs) was performed separately. Scores at last follow-up were obtained for Iowa vowels and consonants, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), and City University of New York (CUNY) sentences. RESULTS: Mean age at time of implant was 37 years for cochlear implantation and 40 years for auditory brainstem implantation (P = .790, t test). Nine of 10 patients had a CI and ABI on contralateral sides, and one had both devices on the same side. Mean duration of deafness in the implanted ear was 4.3 years for both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation (P = .491, t test). Follow-up range was 1 to 28 years. CI performance on NU-CHIPS was 32% to 100%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 56% to 100%. Four patients experienced an eventual decline in CI function to unusable levels. ABI performance on NU-CHIPS was 40% to 80%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 38% to 94%. There was no notable decline in ABI function over time. CONCLUSIONS: If the cochlear nerve is intact, cochlear implantation can be an effective strategy for hearing rehabilitation in NF2. However, a significant proportion experience a decline in CI performance related to growing vestibular schwannoma or tumor treatment. Auditory brainstem implantation remains the standard option for surgical hearing rehabilitation in NF2, but peak performance is generally lower than that achievable with cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2163-2169, 2018.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02ae59bc3ffe278e651a70https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CNAP To Predict Functional Cochlear Nerve Preservation in NF-2: Cochlear Implant or Auditory Brainstem Implant2008 · 18 citations
  2. 2Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2 and Bilateral Vestibular Schwannoma2006 · 59 citations
  3. 3Hearing Rehabilitation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patients: Cochlear versus Auditory Brainstem Implantation2008 · 105 citations
  4. 4Cochlear Implantation in the Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patient: Long‐Term Follow‐up2007 · 135 citations
  5. 5Results from a European Clinical Investigation of the Nucleus?? Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant2002 · 169 citations