PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2026Journal of Ornithology1 citationsOpen Access

The impact of urban-related sensory and risk factors on owls: a systematic review

GOGiuseppe OrlandoFCFreya CourseyPSPetra Sumasgutner

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize global impacts of urban-related sensory and risk factors on owls, as key ecological indicators.
  • Literature review of studies on urban-related impacts on nocturnal raptors, specifically owls.
  • Identification of sensory and risk factors in urban environments affecting owl behavior and ecology.
  • Assessment of associations between these factors and owls' ecological traits such as hunting and habitat use.
  • Vehicle collisions with owls are the most documented risk factors across species.
  • Sensory pollution, particularly from artificial light at night and noise, remains inadequately studied despite its potential impact on owls.
  • Contrasting associations exist between roads and sensory pollutants regarding owl behavioral and ecological traits.

Abstract

Abstract Urbanisation is a globally increasing phenomenon with diverse impacts on biodiversity. Interest in how urbanisation affects raptors is growing because, as top predators, they can be used as bioindicators for ecosystem functioning and sentinels for environmental change. However, a comprehensive synthesis detailing the global-scale impact of urban-related sensory and risk factors on nocturnal raptors (i.e. owls) is lacking. In this review, we examined the literature to identify such factors and to outline their association with behavioural and ecological traits of owls living in urban environments. Overall, we show that several urban-related sensory and risk factors affect owls, with vehicle collisions on roads being the most widely documented across species. Conversely, sensory pollution remains poorly investigated, which is surprising given that nocturnal and acoustic hunters, such as owls, might be severely impacted by artificial light at night (ALAN) and anthropogenic noise. We also highlight a research gap on this topic from the global south, where urbanisation is rapidly increasing. Importantly, we show that roads and sensory pollutants are associated in contrasting ways with many owl behavioural and ecological traits, such as hunting and habitat use. We argue that the interplay among roads, noise and ALAN influences how owls’ prey species use roads, which may turn areas near roads into ecological traps. The severity of their impacts may depend on the intensity and type of anthropogenic noise and artificial lights along roads. Further research in this direction will have important implications for the conservation of owls in urban environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Orlando et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c394ce8c8c81e9640ff2https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-026-02406-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper